seeing many people watching the analogy of "Little Times", it is not Think of it because they all look like gorgeous shit? I had to defend Baz Luhrmann for the first time. Gorgeousness is his habit. Both gatsby and daisy appeared in the sea and sky feast. This is indeed Baz’s personal style, but the simple plot is not to blame for him. This edition is faithful to the original. The extent has been quite unexpected.
I have always felt that the most stupid way to adapt a novel with a first-person narrative is to copy the original perspective. The original first-person is for the convenience of narration and generation of comments, not how important I am in the story. The movie is already from God’s perspective and I give it stupidly. When the key role is filmed, even the kind of scenes that the original work was recorded just for the testimony have to be filmed truthfully as a plot light bulb, which is totally unnecessary. So nick is in this film. In fact, apart from being a bridge between the two people, other existence does not affect the progress very much. The film is not a POV as it is, and it is always OS. Not only does it appear that the director is incompetent in narrative, but the characters are infinite, and they give The audience created unnecessary illusions-
nick was talking about causes and consequences, and Gatsby was laid for nearly 30 minutes before he made his debut. The suspense was too full, and his life experience, personality, and motives made people curious, just like nostalgia. It was a conspiracy involving the entire world, but I looked forward to it for two and a half hours and found that it seemed to be a Qiong Yao story. No wonder the non-original party wanted to scold the mother. It's not that the plot of the original novel is so substantial. I don't actually fan the original, but at least the story is clear and simple. It's not as crazy as the movie. The narrative of the novel is light, so the atmosphere is quite timely.
However, when it comes to the original work, I really don’t like the tone of Fitzgerald, because his writing always reveals that he is a primitive high-end atmosphere and a high-end class, and he is a "big city who has met the world." "Tune, narcissistic and snobbish. Even if the United States was indeed in this period in the 1920s and 1920s, the nouveau riche rose up overnight and spent money like dirt, which had a huge impact on the former European high-ranking officials and nobles who ate the royal food. So the conservatives were sour and contemptuous to see them writing about them, but people The Englishman Maugham wrote this paragraph together, which can cleverly conceal this tone (in fact, he has it in his bones). What is the superiority of your Fitzgerald, an American furniture dealer's son there?
So substituted into the first person of the novel, nick in the original book bears some of Fitzgerald’s narcissism and judgment. Although Gatsby is always regarded as a friend, the details are full of preconceived scrutiny of the nouveau riche, including those of Gatsby. Clumsy and stupid little words and deeds, since they are based on subjective descriptions of people like nick, of course will appear to be very exaggerated. It seems that the whole environment pays special attention to the difference between the rich generation and the rich N generation, it is so narrow.
But mud, in the movie, Nick chose Spider-Man to play, and he was very angry after one second of his appearance. There is no such subjective judgment. He is a good friend of nympho. Seeing everything is fresh and kind. Pulmonarily help and care. Although it's not annoying, but really, Maguire, you can practice your acting skills, don't you always be the same... The
ideal daisy actor in my heart is Scarlett Johansson (seems to be approached?), except Daisy is a big-breasted young woman, and she also has a temperament that is actually very secular but loves to act very often by self-hypnosis. The carey sister looks too shrewd and lacks the superficial and chaotic sense of vulgarity. But I didn't expect the effect to exceed expectations, and the performance was okay, but there was no spark with Xiao Li. Moreover, the omission of daisy’s disgusting bitch is simplified in the latter part of the movie, otherwise the acting skills can be tested more. From this omission, it can be seen that the essence of baz is still pure and fresh, and likes to retain the beautiful fantasy...
The reunion of gasby and daisy, the highlight, the visual beauty is still attributed to baz, and the plot and feeling are still in line with the original. I feel that Fitzgerald has written this paragraph very well. Whether it is a reader or an audience, I am not sure about the depth of the relationship between the two people. On the surface, it seems that the emotions have arrived, and they are nervous and excited. In the end, it is warm and sweet. , But it always gives people the feeling of chewing, because it is not touching and not special. Not because Fei did not write well enough, but because with Daisy's character and feelings, with gatsby's fantasies and folly, together it is such a mediocre level of acting, and the story he wants to tell is exactly the same.
——Extras, what is the reunion of true true love? So I want to digress to give an example of our great "Wuthering Heights". The two of them were so excited that they were righteous and righteous. They didn't even think that there was anything inappropriate in front of their husbands. He refused to even take one more look. That scene, the shock, is unique, and I have never seen any text describing the reunion that can be surpassed.
Western novels, the subject matter is really narrow enough. I always think Gatsby and "Blade" are similar in many ways. Even Daisy's husband thought of Isabella's husband when he appeared on the stage. However, in comparison between female pigs, Isabella is more shrewd than Daisy, knows exactly what she wants, and will not drag the situation to an ugly step. She is the rational version of Catherine, the most realistic of the three. Actively learn from the meaning, because there are too few women who can understand their lives.
But having said that, it is true that the simpler the character, the less likely it is to hurt the body. I didn’t think of it when I was reading, but the scene in the movie where the three of us had a showdown in the room directly floated to The Howling. Similarly, the two rivals fought face to face. Daisy left a few drops of crocodile tears and was frightened by Gatsby’s lose temper. After arriving, there was a tilt in my heart, because the old lover would be too insecure even if he didn't crash, and ordinary women would seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. In that similar lock-door confrontation scene, Catherine seemed to have the queen's aura above everyone, mocking all kinds of contempt on both sides, but when she turned around, she went crazy, her personality was too complicated, and hurt herself.
Forced to be compared, is it intentional to have Xiao Li starring and a second male bodyguard who looks exactly like "Titanic" in frequent appearances to reproduce classic scenes? Fifteen years later, I will be you... Comparing the two characters before and after Xiao Li, it can be seen that love does not depend on whether a man has enough capital, but only on the original taste of a woman. You met Rose fifteen years ago, and she will follow you without hesitation. Fifteen years later, you met Daisy, who won the world and she doesn’t love you either.
It’s okay for the ending world to be cold, ancient and modern, both at home and abroad. Gatsby is at best a party thrower, the tree fell and the party animal is scattered, and it’s not Schindler Martin Luther King. Is the world cruel? To talk about the vanity of building social prestige through parties, you can see that Uncle Eliot in "Blade's Edge" is so vivid, snobbish and cute, thanks to the author's level of character creation. So from the book to the movie, what people after reading it most want to ask is, the great Gatsby, what is so great?
Raising the "central idea" is not unique to Chinese language education. Obviously, literary circles all over the world love this kind of mixed food. "The Great Gatsby" has always been called the epitome of the American Dream by critics. In fact, I think Fitzgerald was less than 30 years old when he created it. How can he have such a high level of consciousness, probably because he wanted to write about his drunken life. Some anecdotes, nothing more than a little literary and artistic color, I did not expect to bet on the treasure and be blown into the American dream. Since then, it has been faked and became true, and began to actively write about all kinds of sad young people...
even if it is about the American dream. The essence of this story is also an anti-American dream. Gatsby was finally defeated, from "and I only have money" to a man with no money, and repeatedly emphasized the pitifulness of returning to the original, the feeling of the story and "Wall Street." The American dream of getting rich and plummeting is not the same. It is not like the latter warning and educating you to be down-to-earth and steady and hardworking to get rich, but to promote the sense of hierarchy and superiority of Fitzgerald I mentioned above. The feeling is that the dragon begets the dragon, the phoenix begets the phoenix, even if they are all rich people, only those who are famous and promising in the family for several generations are worthy of respect. You are a little-known phoenix man who has suddenly become rich, no matter how hard you try to sit. Even the mountains and rivers will never be equal forever!
This kind of value can be understood in Europe. It is completely against the spirit of Uncle Tom to release the United States. The American lady in "Tang Tun" was praised to death by everyone. It is not that she said in the financial crisis of her husband's family: i'm american. we take guns. go to fight! It’s hard to say whether there is any hypocrisy in the hearts of Americans. At least the main theme on the table is definitely advocating pioneering and adventurous. What’s discouraging about "Gatsby", which took place entirely in the United States, is that not only the wealthy and leisurely people like daisy, nick, and tom have that snobbery concept, but even gatsby himself wants to get close to their three views. .
Looking at some comments, I don’t think that gatsby’s “greatness” is that he still maintains a “naked heart” in the glitzy field. A man with an innocent heart certainly doesn't want him to be abandoned if he doesn't have money in his dreams, and if he has money, he will give him a hug, but gatsby has never learned from a teacher since he was a child, taking this as a matter of course or even a spiritual pillar. Although the poor are too noble and boring, it would be an overkill to portray such a role, and what he deserves is such a vulgar woman as Daisy, a carrot and a pit.
So what I understood was "awesome", in fact, it was a quotation of popular public opinion, the legendary person in the eyes of those party-goers was "awesome", and Fitzgerald or nick, after they thought they had a deep contact, opened a hot post on the end of the world. The full name of the title is "Don't spit it!" ! 818 The "Great Gatsby" that has been popular recently! ! "
And the so-called "naked sons", I guess they are actually naive actions, misjudgment of each other's feelings, loss of control of their own emotions, and self-righteous noble and glamorous, the other party impulsively said that they eloped and will not leave. After all, this is not decency, but stupidity, and was depressed by the imaginary nobility norms to lower the originally low IQ.
So no matter from the perspective of the metaphor, "The Great Gatsby" can't talk about the American dream. After all, it's just a mundane story in the mirror. The book is well written, and the film uses the visual effects of BlingBling to create the sensational atmosphere of the prosperous and lonely Iraqi people. It will bring you a burst of sorrow. I have the opportunity to say more. Popular vocabulary such as all over the diaosi counterattack and Haitian Feast. That's it, don't push yourself up, and don't blame baz, the book is not written by him after all, people are really not Si Niang type.
Speaking of the most satisfying visual presentation, the first lake where you can look at the dream house, both night and day scenes are exactly the same as reading a book. This is the detail that the original party pays the most attention. It is clear that the story is well known, and it takes more than two hours to reread it, or it is for these moments-see if the director is the scene in your mind. 3D printer?
View more about The Great Gatsby reviews
