One is his own remake of the mix, which
is a tribute to XXX films. The other
is Quentin’s film.
This is my name. This kind of film is different from the previous films.
Usually, the film promotes the plot by the picture.
And Quentin likes to use dialogue to promote the plot
of his own remake mix, I think it is to kill Bill's kind of
occasional classic paragraphs, but mainly take some classic sections, or classic sections created by him. , Mainly through the screen to promote the plot to
kill Bill. The whole movie is more about killing and killing. Basically, the story is not very clear. Kill it all the way.
If you don’t understand English and don’t read the subtitles, you can almost do it. Seeing a general idea, it's fun to watch.
But vulgar novels, shameless bastards, or falling water dogs, and even Death Proof are basically a bunch of funny jokes, all the way to the end of the film and
occasionally interspersed with some classic scenes, the pictures to embellish the film
basically divide his film into
Most of the two categories are vulgar novels (conversational), and the other is Killing Bill. At present, only Killing Bill 1&2 is of this type,
and this film is Quentin’s latest movie that is similar to Killing Bill.
Quentin’s movie features are very obvious. His movies are like Jay Chou’s songs. You basically don’t need to know who’s the work. Just listen to know that
he likes martial arts, he likes the West, and he likes some shooting techniques and shooting techniques from the 70s to 80s. The bridge is
in Kill Bill 2. He tried to combine martial arts (revenge) and West (revenge).
In fact, I think the combination is not good, but foreigners like to watch it, but I think that in Kill Bill 1&2, 1 is much better than 2
because I think 1 is a purer, pure martial arts movie (tribute to Bruce Lee and XXXXXXyou name it)
When the second part was mixed, it gave people a very nondescript feeling.
This time when shooting Django Unchained, Pure West was set
before the outbreak of the Civil War. The
film used many classic shooting methods from the 70s to 80s,
such as the black room setting, and suddenly a close-up shot . People come to the opening of
a large amount of blood, blood blood
but a bunch of mixed modern elements
such as rap background music
montage a few small paragraphs
and a bunch because now we are very sensitive to racial issues, but very funny in the background story of the joke
movie There are not many dialogues here. The
main line is very clear. The whole film is estimated to be sloppy with a taste of the 80s.
At first glance, it
seems to be Rodríguez’s new film. The whole film is very compact
(spoilers). through)!
Christopher Waltz claimed to be a doctor on the surface. In fact, it was a bounty hunter who
bought Django and killed the slave trader in the first place. This
reflects that he was an anti-slavery person who
bought Django and took him to a small town and killed him. The police officer
attracted the sergeant,
why did a clever way to make the doctor buy him?
Ask him to help find three wanted criminals to kill and make money
. I explain the previous story clearly.
1. The doctor is a bounty hunter.
2. Django is a helper.
Then he
found the person to kill, killed it, and escaped from the KKK . Xiaobai fat jonah hill cameo
Django has done what it is required to do and
became a free man who
wanted to save his wife
The doctor suggested that it is better to be a bounty hunter together, and then save his wife (to make money to buy it back)
and then it becomes a traditional
1. The doctor is the master
2. Django is the apprentice and
then enters the master- disciple mode,
then the two fight and kill, get through After a happy winter, I
made a lot of money. Django has a talent for marksmanship. During this period of time, he has had a good marksmanship.
Then I went to find my wife
. Who is it?
Where a rich man, Leonardo DiCaprio
then began to draw up a plan, and then aroused Leonardo’s interest, went to the house to buy slaves, and
passed several incidents along the way to reflect the tragic situation of the blacks at that time. By the way, Leo was shown. The cruelty and inhumanity of the role played by Nadeau
then met his housekeeper Samuel Jackson (how could he not say his most famous national curse in the movie: Motherfxxker···in Quentin’s movie he could not fail Said the word)
and then portrayed the insidious cunning of the butler.
Finally, the butler helped Leonardo discover the plan of the master and Django. After the
last tense scene,
the money was swindled and everyone was happy,
but the master couldn’t stand it and killed Leonard. Many, and I was killed
. Django had no choice but to pick up the gun. The
next is the climax of the film.
After countless blood and corpses were full of the scene, Django was forced to
surrender and was not killed after surrendering, but was sent away. Digging coal
on the road met the director Quentin (he had to make a cameo to save money)
and others, and then lied to them that he was framed by the gangster,
took the gun and brought explosives, and Django killed it again
and saved his wife. , Blow up the manor
At the end of
the film, the whole storyline is not tortuous, and the structure used is the most classic and classic simple Western film structure: the
protagonist meets the master,
follows the master’s learning skills,
meets the boss with
superb skills, and then the master is killed by the boss
after taking revenge for the master. The beauty is back,
but the whole movie is full of Quentin-style humor.
Deliberately sloppy shots and scenery.
Some very antique photography methods and shots from the 1980s use
costumes, music and other details. The
only difference is that this time. the story did not like Kill Bill and interspersed with flashbacks and memories
more like Pulp Fiction cut as a mess
like Deathproof a climax as the end of time in the middle of the film
in contrast, the rhythm is more like Inglourious Basterds
begins with character A tap
after point Character B
finally focuses on portraying the pros and cons. The
difference between the two factions is that there are many characters in Shameless Bastard. There are 4 main characters in DjU. As mentioned
earlier, this film is more visual to promote the plot, so there is not as many words
and rhythms as Shameless Bastard. It has to feel a lot more compact and the film is much faster.
Generally speaking, DJU is a classic Quentin film again. It is the same. People who don’t like Quentin’s films may not like all of his films.
Some people just like to kill Bill. If you do n’t like other series,
then you might like DJU.
If you like vulgar novels, shameless bastards and the like, don’t like killing Bill,
then you probably won’t like DJU.
If you are a Quentin fan, then this movie is a must-see. Without losing the standard, Quentin’s film does not have the feeling of being exhausted as I originally imagined. On the contrary, it seems that he is not old.
Apart from Nolan, he is the only director who has never let me down
View more about Django Unchained reviews
