Shiqi was vaccinated by various "little fresh" and "selling cute" comments before watching the film, thinking that this new version of Spider-Man must take a vibrant youth route. But what I didn't expect at all was that "youth" could not be talked about, instead it became "children" or even "low-age". Mark Webb's resume alone is enough to establish his special position in the eyes of the audience with "500 Days with Summer". It is commendable to be able to interpret the theme of broken love in such a small and fresh way, and the sense of substitution and resonance has reached unprecedented heights. Film is a cunning art, and the effect of subtle changes in technique will be very different. Mark Webb's "The Amazing Spider-Man" is almost completely refreshed than Sam Remy's "Spider-Man". Innovation is a good thing, and it must be innovated this time. Commercial films need not to watch, but to sell. Let Pete Parker return to campus, the heart of "Twilight" is clear. Choosing Emma Stone to accompany the hero, the most important thing is her success in the "Gossip Project." The pertinence of this combination is no weaker than Toby Maguire and Kirsten Dunst. Coupled with the fact that this pair of golden boys and girls are actually doing fake plays off the court, the free publicity offensive is simply even more powerful. There are a lot of factors, and there is almost no film itself. This "The Amazing Spider-Man" has already been half-footed into real money. The plan for this restart really has its subtleties.
However, although I am a fan of Mark Webb, he is extremely disappointed with the film. Thinking about it, I couldn't help being serious. Regrettably, when I take it seriously, I get old. Andrew Garfield first tried his edge in "Social Network", except for the light literature and art, the rest was mediocre. Although he is always happy to be cute in the film, he often pouting, scratching his ears and scratching his cheeks. There are two sentences in the three sentences that are not clear, and he looks very silly and naive. But I am not a high school student after all, so I really don't like it. Moreover, Gwen, the spider girl played by Emma Stone, is an innocent nympho. There is no bondage in the love scene, and the persuasive power is quite weak. But even more absolutely, Pete Parker couldn't bear to be lonely, and directly exposed his identity to the other party the first time. That spit of bold and passionate spider silk, instantly shocked my Three Views, old, really old. Actually can't tolerate heroes embracing beautiful women, I have the urge to think about it. Recalling Sam Remy's version of "Spider-Man", that light kiss hanging upside down on a rainy night is so poetic and moving.
After being integrated into the campus, it does not mean that you can overdraw your youth indefinitely. The most basic values should be retained. But the film was completely dazzled by love, uncle died, blame himself on himself, he must not be delayed. So there was the first time a farce like a chivalrous warrior. It was not until the police came and had to flash people that he thought of the purpose of learning from Lei Feng to do good deeds this time. No wonder the classic monologue "the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility" should be replaced with "fate chooses you", because he is not worthy at all. Whenever he was injured, he would return to the gentle homeland to enjoy the tenderness. The nymphomaniac Gwen also lived up to the expectations. Faced with serious scars, there is no love and compassion in his eyes, but only love, which is considered acceptable. Even the school tyrant inexplicably changed his evil spirits and took the initiative to climb relatives with him. Presumably, the hero's aura is unstoppable. At the end of the film, the idiot's father sacrifices, not only does not complain about Spider-Man, but also takes the initiative to give him his arms. When I heard that the person I liked was willing to break his vow, that smile, could it not be so evil? How could the father under Jiuquan stare at him. Thinking of the old version of Spider-Man is miserable: destitute, physically and mentally burned, anorectal broken, beauty is hard to embrace, and painful. The predecessors are realistic and inspirational, and the younger generations are illusory and obscene. Is this the screenwriter insinuating the impetuous and vain social status quo?
Compared with the old version, the audiovisual effect of the film has been enhanced a lot. After all, the difference is more than 10 years. IMAX plus 3D, the first-person perspective of the early adopters is indeed amazing, but I always feel that the sense of space and rhythm when flying between the forested buildings does not have the taste of the old version. Only the signature ending action of the final cutscene style looked smooth and comfortable. The only focus of enthusiasm, the bridge of the mechanical arm, is also faint, and it can't set off a lasting climax.
Although he loves Sam Remy's Spider-Man, he doesn't want him to spend any more time on tinkering. After all, "World of Warcraft" is the highlight of the accumulation. "Renovation" is worthy of encouragement, but if the taste completely changes, there should be no, and the should not have been flooded, then it will be reduced to nonsense. Of course, the above are all the consequences of my seriousness, because I am irresistibly old. The rest, apart from sighing that people are no longer young, only re-watch the old version of Spider-Man.
View more about The Amazing Spider-Man reviews
