No style

Telly 2021-10-20 17:50:32

If it weren't for the hype of a bunch of people, I wouldn't have watched Mission Impossible 6, because I'm tired of Hollywood action movies. As a result, seeing that the evaluation was so high, I walked into the theater with the expectation of watching a breakthrough action movie. The result was...70 yuan was wasted. There is not one of the worst Hollywood movies I have watched recently. Worse than Ant-Man 2.

The biggest problem with Mission Impossible 6 is that the action scenes have no style. You can't see the difference between him and any other Hollywood action movie. In a word, it's a job of a poor level. What is the style of an action movie? For example, a pseudo-documentary with many shadows, hand-held throughout, high-speed editing, cutting back and forth from very close and very far, and violently turning the focus from time to time. For example, selling copy-type surround mirror + exploding slow motion, the more advanced version of this set is the kind of full real-time scheduling of George Miller in Mad Max. Or it is my favorite John Wick, the mid-range shot is full length, testing the actors and scheduling. The result is in this movie, all! No! Have! All the positions are very mediocre and unimaginative. There was a long shot of parkour in the middle, and it ended when Tang Ye jumped over and hung it on the edge of the building. At first glance, I knew that it was the director of Xinghuo who wanted to play some flowers and couldn't play it anymore. You compare it to the Bournemouth’s heavy 3 miles, the cameraman jumped through the window with Matt Damon and made a judgment. Even the typical Hollywood popcorn action movie like "London Has Fallen" has a long-shot street fighting ability. In this film, there is no real heart...The one that I am most impressed is the section of Tang Ye brain repairing the carjacking. There is no sound effect. , Classical soundtrack, the photographer holds the camera behind Tang Ye and pushes forward. This paragraph is quite accent, what about the others? there is none left.

Going back to the style, you can see Tang Ye's HALO (High Jump, Low Open) passage, and film reviews have blew up, saying that Tang Ye took 106 jumps to complete it. What is the result? There is really no style. What is real style? You go to see the HALO in "Godzilla", it is really a unilateral sling. (Although Godzilla’s movie is quite general except for this HALO) By the way: I think the best HALO paragraph is actually the one in "Battlefield 3", the whole main perspective of HALO, of course it is The privilege of the game.

The literary drama is... my goodness... I originally thought that Atomic Blonde's literary drama was already very bad, but in my life I still rely on comparison... The humanistic drama has a poor rhythm, but it has a tone! Is the line of Disc 6 an American model play? The embarrassment is close to paying party dues before death! And there is really nothing but Exposition! I have never seen a movie whose lines are really only Exposition! And this photography...the lighting is very poor, let’s not talk about it, you, whoever talks, cut the close-up of the college student, what about the work-level photography? Can you change the position besides the front and back fight? Several people talked for several minutes, and there is really no wool except for the front and back fights! My personal feeling is that there are more close-ups of Tang Ye’s face in this film than necessary. This obviously has something to do with Tang Ye being the film’s producer...

In short, to say that it is the best action movie in the near future is fine. Just a mediocre and meaningless popcorn movie. I'll just concentrate on waiting for my John Wick 3.

View more about Mission: Impossible - Fallout reviews

Extended Reading

Mission: Impossible - Fallout quotes

  • Wolf Blitzer: Stand by. I'm told we're about to get some additional information. I've just been handed a document from Nils Delbruuk, a nuclear weapons specialist who claims to have built the weapons used in these attacks. I've been asked to read this manifesto in its entirety. "There has never been peace without first a great suffering. The greater the suffering, the greater the peace. As mankind is drawn to his self-destruction like a moth to the candle, the so-called defenders of peace - the church, the government, the law - work tirelessly to save humanity from itself. But, by averting disaster, they serve to delay a peace that can only come through an inevitable baptism of fire. The suffering I bring you is not the beginning of the end. It is the beginning of a greater mutual understanding through common suffering. It is the first step toward the ultimate brotherhood of man. The suffering I bring you is the bridge to ultimate peace."

  • Page from "The Destruction of the Current World Order" Manifesto written by John Lark and seen during Ethan Hunt's briefing.: "There has never been peace without first a great suffering, the greater the suffering, the greater the peace. As mankind is drawn to his self-destruction like a moth to the candle, the so-called defenders of peace - the church, the government, the law - work tirelessly to save humanity from itself. But, by averting disaster, they serve to delay a peace that can only come through an inevitable baptism of fire. The suffering I bring you is not the beginning of the end. It is the beginning of a greater mutual understanding through common suffering. It is the first step towards the ultimate brotherhood of man. The suffering I bring you is the bridge to ultimate peace. Today, mankind has been handed the opportunity to escape his destiny, an otherwise inevitable conclusion to a thousand years of intolerance and fear. I call all rationalists who can stand and join in the struggle against the radical theists, all of which fall beneath a common umbrella of ideology. If we were to continue any further we would reach mythology and Aesop's fables. When do we stop? Any belief in a spirituality with no other proof, other than the cravings to project one's self over the rational thinking of the others must be eradicated as it does not only halt progression and development of the human mind and reach, but also hinders it. Here I will emphasize clearly that the judgment upheld against us will be one of human hands, not of a god or other worldly being. Part of the absurd rational is what leads to the obscure justifications, the believers place upon their own disgraceful and belligerent behavior. No. The loss of human life cannot and will not be justified. For this is not the taking of human lives. They are merely puppets, hollow shells that were once human beings. Brainwashed by stories and tales of old, their weak minds have been overpowered by the pressure placed on them by other lifeless puppets. And so, the cycle continues."