I still have my memory of "Spider-Man 2" eight years ago, and "Spider-Man 3" 5 years ago is still in sight. So one day, after taking a look at the trailer of "The Amazing Spider-Man", the first reaction was: Why tell the same story again?
As if to answer my question (and maybe many people have asked this question), "The Amazing Spider-Man" intentionally or unintentionally passed a teacher's mouth at the end, telling me: There is only one story in the world, that is, "Who am I? "The
implication is that although the story of "Spider-Man" has been filmed, everyone will change the tricks, each with its own ingenuity and difference. What do you think of this version of me?
Some friends may not have watched the 2004 and 2007 versions of Spider-Man. Simply put, Sam Remy, Tobey Maguire, and my little Jan’s version of Spider-Man, the first two are very good, the script Well, the performance is good, the special effects are good (at the level of the year), the third part is not very good, and Toby suddenly somehow, very uncute, very ugly, unbearable. They did not continue to shoot, very wise.
But is it wise to change a group of people and do it again in such a short period of time? Different people have different opinions on this, and they have to see the box office.
I have been teaching over the years, and one thing I discovered is that enlightenment is a work that needs to be carried out continuously. Don't assume that certain things (even common sense) are known to everyone. In the same way, although "Spider-Man" is a well-known story, there is always someone who hasn't read it. And in the movie industry, new people and old people come and go too fast, and young fans grow up fast. Toby was cute ten years ago. Ten years later, everyone is paying attention to Dou Sen and Garfield. As for Keanu Reeves, who else is there besides me remember? (Even me, Colin is paying more attention these days)
From this perspective, there is a good reason for the reshoot. Although the stories are the same, each generation has different storytellers. Of course, there are all-pervasive 3D.
So, what about "The Amazing Spider-Man"?
The story is much the same. Peter is bitten by a spider, gains a supernatural power, and goes through his mental journey to become a heroic Spiderman. The narrative is quite calm. Although the constitution is conservative, there is nothing wrong with it. The villain took the same path of mutation, but became a monster. The villain is Luna's father in "Harry Potter", who plays very well. The small difference is that this version of Peter's girlfriend is Gwen, and Peter is not so entangled, and Gwen will not half-hearted. As for the villain’s conspiracy, alas, these days, there have been very few villains with technical content.
The picture and special effects maintain the standard. The scene of Peter flying over the walls between skyscrapers gave me, who had always been content with 2D, a desire to watch 3D. (Hate, why do you write English sentences?) The
film is also quite comedic. Peter is introverted. He was bullied before he changed to Spider-Man. He made a lot of jokes and made a lot of jokes after discovering that he had super powers. , The tone is not as bitter and bitter as the previous edition.
The reason for this impression, I think, is largely because Andrew Garfield's appearance is much better than Toby's, so it is basically impossible for Peter to be too hard. He also seems to have a more personal sense of humor, and there is always a kind of nonchalant chic. This kind of personal temperament is very pleasing, you can't not like him, but you don't worry about him too much. Of course, as a nympho, Andrew is definitely a feast. The facial features are refined and distinct, big eyes, emotional flow, tall and thin, light and strong. Under his superficial "weakness of literature", there is a kind of expectation that is ready to go. This is a bit like Keanu, it's all quiet like a virgin, moving like a rabbit.
Therefore, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is a qualified standard popcorn movie. It is pleasing and satisfying to watch. I have booked a ticket for IMAX 3D, and I am going to take peanuts to see it. Children can watch this film with confidence.
ps. There are easter eggs at the end of the film.
pps. I saw the trailer of "The Dark Knight Rises", it's nothing~~~
Update on July 2nd: I saw IMAX 3D, most of the pictures are no different, only the end of the film has a real sense of 3D. So, basically look at 2D. But there is no such bad 3D feeling, the production is still quite good. I like this new spider more and more. In addition, I saw the trailer of "The Hobbit" on the big screen, it was the original one, but the feeling of watching the big screen is different after all. Take a deep breath. . .
View more about The Amazing Spider-Man reviews
