ending", the scene where the host and the host brought the baby together on the farm came out. The whole movie theater was laughing. I guess they didn't read the original book. At the beginning of the book, the host insisted that he didn't want children because of The Hunger Games. For this reason, it took ten years after the war was over to decide to have a child. Moreover, when I closed my book, I felt that people who have experienced war can no longer enjoy a normal life. Some people say this. The film’s description of politics is very naive, in fact, this is normal, because the original is written in the first person, so the whole thing is viewed from the perspective of a teenager, and the political content is only described from the perspective of the heroine. There are some clues, and the real situation is all up to the reader’s brain. Moreover, Katniss is obviously high in the movie. In fact, in the book, she only wants to protect her sister, Gail and Pita. She doesn’t care about other people so much. , And many movies portray her as handsome and awesome. In fact, she was just impulsive at the time, and she regretted it afterwards. Moreover, after they participated in the Hunger Games, their body and mind were already devastated. There is no way to fall asleep peacefully anymore. It is not shown in these movies. The heroine in the book can basically be regarded as half disabled after the war, and has been exposed to so many explosions at close range, please. But in In the movie, I guess it’s because the big cousin is too strong, so I can’t tell at all. But in general, I think the third remake of the movie is better than the original, at least the main line is clearer, and the idea of the original is also grasped. It’s the essence. The most touching scene in the movie is the last battle in front of President Snow’s mansion. During the airstrike, a little Kaipit refugee girl cried loudly beside the body of her mother who had just been killed. The hostess cast her on her. Look at pity. If it were in a Hollywood blockbuster with traditional heroism, the next step would definitely be the protagonist desperately running to the side of the child and picking her up, and then dodge all attacks like a divine aid along the way, saving the child and winning the final Victory. However, in this film, the heroine’s attention only stayed on the child for a second, and was immediately forced to flee forward by the ensuing artillery. What happened to the child? I have been looking forward to the director. I can give that cute little girl another shot, but I also find that the idea is ridiculous. This is a real war. "In a war, no one can protect anyone. "--The aura of the protagonist Katniss still exists, but what is under that aura is only alive crippled after the war.
View more about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 reviews
