In August of this year, by chance, I found a book "Mysterious Visitor" by People's Publishing House on the Internet. The introduction was very attractive to me, so I bought it. The next thing is logical. The four books of Jack Rachel from People’s Publishing House have been bought. After reading them
, I know from the books that these books by Childe (the original author) have been published by Paramount and Atang. Brother bought it, so he searched the Internet with the mentality of trying it out, and found this film, downloaded it without hesitation, and watched it overnight.
One sentence comment: it basically reflects the style and
plot of Jack Rachel. I won’t say much.
As an action movie, the fight is clean, not muddy, and the rhythm is tight. It is still very good.
As a reasoning movie, Rachel I see blood every sentence, and clues can be found in the film. This is fine.
However, if you have not seen the original and watched the movie directly, this film would not be so friendly:
1. Rachel buys clothes Throwing away the old clothes afterwards. This is his traditional habit and his mark. If you haven’t read the original, this point
in the film is basically meaningless. 2. After Rachel takes a bath, the camera slides across his abdomen, and there is a line The scar. This scar is introduced in the first book of Rachel's series "KILLING FLOOR". It was a result of an operation. If you haven't read the original work, this scene shows Rachel's bravery. The introduction, but in fact this detail is also his hallmark
. 3. Rachel in the play is quick thinking, quick response, vigorous, well-versed in the use of various guns and equipment; the plot is also quick and direct, and the jump is very strong. If you haven't read the book, then this person looks too fake, and the plot is too jumpy; just like many people complain about, what kind of bad movie is this, it's a personal hero, suspended animation! Only by reading the original can you understand these contents
4. About the Wimbledon champion: There is an explanation in the second book of the Rachel series "DIE TRYING" (DIE TRYING). The original story is a dialogue between Rachel and a lady (Hawley Johnson). Ray: I have won the Wimbledon championship, about: Do you still play tennis? Ray: It's the Wimbledon shooting competition of the army. I am the only non-Marine sniper champion in decades. Only from this can we understand why Uncle Navy has a deep memory of Rachel. It is also understandable by looking at the original work.
There are still many details. I won’t say more here.
To understand the film, you still have to read the original work, personally. Hurry up, the original book is much more
peaty than the movie , it's stupid. . . Written as the original recommended. . . Tears ran. . . .
Let's make do with it. . .
Finally, I would like to add that the reason why the evaluation is a recommendation is that if you only watch the movie, it should be okay, but with the original book at the bottom, it can be a recommendation. Besides, I also like Jack Rachel very much. . . There are personal subjective factors. . .
One last sentence: I really don't like the label of "Prodigal Detective" by Overseas Chinese Publishing House for Rachel. . . It's too ugly, and it doesn't reflect Rachel's style at all. . . It’s the
first time I recommend the four books by People’s Publishing House.
View more about Jack Reacher reviews
