5 stars in the first half and 1 star in the end.
I thought that by the time the municipal building was bombed, the story was only halfway through. I thought that the director would eventually produce a profound film that would reflect on the American judicial system. I thought that the clues of the outstanding prosecutors were only part of the 10-year preconspiracy of the spy male protagonist. , I thought that the male protagonist would let excellent prosecutors violate human rights, violate the law but can punish the crime and know who the criminal is, but because there is no evidence, in order to respect the judicial system and let the male protagonist get away with justice (such as the Simpson case in the United States) Choice.
However, this result made me even more convinced that there is also political correctness in the United States (the black must be the righteous party and must be the ultimate winner; personal anti-government behavior is impossible to succeed), and that American movies are also the result of compromise. The American judicial system can be questioned, but its foundation cannot be touched.
Finally, what I want to say is that maybe because I watched the first half of the movie, I had too much expectations for this movie, so I went online, but my feeling at this time is indeed that the works of an era cannot be separated from it. Due to the limitations of an era, films released in the United States must not arouse the masses' dissatisfaction with their country. So we got an anticlimactic disability movie.
View more about Law Abiding Citizen reviews