What material can be under the sea surface for two thousand years without being corroded at all; why the entire ocean is frozen, but there is an empty hall on the seabed with only a layer of ice on the sculpture; why the aliens must There is a head, a torso, four limbs or even five toes-these are no longer slots, I can already understand it, the film performance needs.
But why on earth knowing that AI will contaminate the chip when eating food, and creating a complete esophagus for him, are you afraid that maintenance workers will lose their jobs? Even Master Asimov knew how to ask Daniel's friend to put a plastic bag in his chest, why not use such a simple method! And such an AI is completely waterproof, and it’s okay to soak for two thousand years...I don’t understand...
and why the technology has been developed to the point where it can give AI feelings so brutal, but it can’t be remotely operated to destroy the robot. The main chip that caused the scrapped robots to run all over the street... Can you understand how high in the science and technology tree that AI can "from the heart" produce feelings... After
David found out that he was not unique , I impulsively smashed the AI of the same model as myself, and the sense of violation almost broke through the sky. In the end, why an AI, without receiving instructions, can have the impulse to destroy an abstract concept! Is that really unsafe? Isn't it as unsafe as an AI that doesn't obey the Three Laws? Don’t say that because he has emotions, even if it is a human being, there is a mechanism of guilt to death to a certain extent. In fact, we now feel the instinctive physical aversion when we cannibalize the same kind and the morality that develops after civilization is established. Both are some form of ashamed death mechanism.
And I really don’t understand why people cloned with hair are affected by the so-called “trajectory of time and space”. Speaking of "space-time trajectory", what is it? This setting is actually just for BE. Mr. Sai! Mr. Sai, open your eyes and look at me!
——I really can’t take the above points as if I didn’t see them...there are others but I can’t remember them now.
What about the plot besides these bugs that make people play?
Anyway, I think it's too emotional.
Needless to say, David, his adoptive father, always regarded him as a toy. The adoptive mother doesn't really love him, she just wants to get the love and comfort of a child when her son is at stake, even if there is only such feelings, she decides to activate his function.
It's no different from people who raise cats because they think they are cute, find that the cat will shed its hair, scratch the sofa and knock over the cup, and then feel confident about it and decide to throw it away.
Wearing the cloak of artificial intelligence is actually telling a story between irresponsible parents and children eager for affection. Two thousand years, the vicissitudes of life, and the extinction of mankind are just the artistic exaggeration of this story.
Of course, commercial films must be simple and sensational, but excessive sensationalism will hinder in-depth thinking. After the audience saw it, they sighed about the AI's unanswered but unswerving love, and then mapped themselves to the sadness and pity (this is almost the easiest motif to resonate), and sighed a few times that human beings are not up to the program, they are doomed No relationship with eternity-it's over.
However, the discussion of the boundaries between AI and humans that I want to see has no substantive content. Probably I was nitpicking and I had too high expectations for this film.
View more about A.I. Artificial Intelligence reviews
