This film is adapted from a novel, and the investment is relatively small, only 60 million US dollars. You can take a break.
Don't underestimate investment. While Hollywood blockbusters give you sensory excitement, have you ever thought about what you see in such blockbusters? What do you want to tell us? As a result, after every dazzling and dazzling stimulus, I went deep into it, but found that I was fighting in a fight at all, and then I didn't know what to say.
On the contrary, this film is different, and the characters in the plot have been improved. The opening sniper close-up explained the cause of the entire film. Although there is no dialogue, the tension and suspense makes people have to look further.
After the shooting, the suspect brought out the protagonist in our film while being interrogated. He was looking for a man named Jack Recher. So what kind of character is this?
When the two investigators talked about this man, they learned from the side that the protagonist of the film is different from the heroes we know in the past. What is admirable is not only his brilliant and amazing past, but also that this man lives in the modern age. It is a ghost. A person living in the digital age has no credit card, no mobile phone, no e-mail box, and no address. You can't find him unless he lets you find it. What such a person looks like is full of mystery, and it makes people more and more to find out.
The film gives us such a point of view that the laws of this world are determined by people. It is precisely because people determine that there will be imperfections, and there will be unclear injustices like in the film. There are legal restrictions, so we need characters like Jack to exist in this world. Because Jack doesn't care about the evidence, he only cares about what is correct. He is a ranger with nothing, so he can defeat the bad guys without any scruples. This kind of film subject matter. It reminds me of the character played by Liu Ye in the domestic film "Tough Guy", who fights against social injustices, and the heroes who walked the rivers and lakes in ancient times.
One of the highlights in the film is that the protagonist's unique skill is close-range combat, which also conforms to the characteristics of the original book. Now the blockbuster movies are bad, and many movies use various high-tech weapons and equipment, and I'm tired of watching them. On the contrary, the ingenious use of hands and elbows as primitive weapons to fight with people at close range makes people's eyes brighter and highlights the personality of the ranger.
The second aspect of the film is that Jack finally hits the villain black policeman who is hiding behind the kidnapped female lawyer.
The car chasing scene is relatively less exciting than imagined, but I still admire the fact that Tom can not stand in for him and go to the car chasing battle in person. It is really not easy for the actors to do this.
The setting of the big villain in the film has both bright spots and shortcomings. The bright spot is that the big villain behind the scenes tells how he ate multiple fingers of his left and right hands in order to survive. It is not easy, which fully reflects the viciousness and cruelty, and at the same time let his men choose to eat themselves. The scene of the finger being alive or being shot is also eye-catching. But at the end, the stamina was insufficient, too hasty, and Jack was shot in the head with a gun to death. Perhaps it might be more interesting to fight each other for a while.
Of course, the shooting angle of the film is of course the kind of bad guys who have a relationship with the heroes will not end well. The ending can basically be guessed. The whole film narrative is a bit old and lacks new ideas, but the in-depth portrayal of the characters makes up for it. This is not enough.
View more about Jack Reacher reviews
