fact Even if there are criticisms, I don’t care because the expansion of thinking depends on the collision of different voices. Moreover, the views do not represent the position. I can like this piece and I can make criticisms of this piece. Also, as long as the other party can have opinions and logic, it is not necessary. My position is that the moment when the swearer is swearing is the moment of lowering the price. I naturally choose to ignore it and
return to the topic. It is undeniable that this is a masterpiece, but I have never figured out why it is so popular in China. The film has a good reputation in the US box office. If I win a full victory, I fully understand, but if any other countries such as France, India, South Korea, Argentina are still hot, I will be confused. The history of the past few decades, from the Vietnam War to hippies to Silicon Valley. The major events of the entire United States in the past few decades are condensed in this film. Even the spirit of keep running in the film reminds Americans of the support of John F. Kennedy back then. The unforgettable "Great Hike" initiated by General David-Shoop is bound to have a great resonance for such a film. The Americans are bound to empathize with each other. In addition, the visual effects of adding Forrest to the expansion are in this film. The success of the United States is entirely due to the expected
dwelling, the era of naked marriage, etc. Why are so popular ? Because the common people in China see it and feel it can resonate. If this TV series is also popular in the United States, it is really confusing.
So if this film can get five stars in the United States, it is reasonable to lose one star when it comes to China, but why is it still a high score? Woolen cloth? Maybe many of my friends were inspired by Forrest’s uncompromising spirit and my point of view is very clear: this movie is by no means an inspirational film, nor does Forrest have any inspirational meaning.
The core of the film is not to promote the spirit of Forrest not to give up, but to show the history of the United States in recent decades. However, if it is simply described from the perspective of a bystander, it will be reduced to a second-rate documentary. The film needs to rely on one person's experience. To show these things, but the character's soul should not be too barren, otherwise it is no different from the documentary narration. So the screenwriter added an appropriate proportion of Forrest's personal experience, love, and at the same time, in order to avoid the subjective opinions of the protagonist, it is most appropriate to set a low-intellectual merchant. But in fact, the role of Forrest is very obvious to ensure the balance between the objectivity of historical presentation and the entertainment of storytelling.
So even if the purpose of Forrest is not inspirational, does Forrest objectively produce a certain inspirational meaning? I think there are but very limited. Although many inspirational movies are a routine, they at least have a few indispensable inspirational elements: encountering setbacks, self-denial, challenging oneself, defeating oneself, etc., which are generally reflected in sports, dance, and fighting. Although the ending of the movie of the theme is often the protagonist, the small universe bursts out inexplicably, the expression is very fake, but at least the above set of core processes is applicable to real life so that it can produce inspirational meaning.
Looking back at Forrest Gump, this film is only related to inspiration. The element is to keep running without giving up. This is a very imaginary thing to the same extent as the slogan of serving the people. Self-denial defeats the self. These elements? What did Forrest do without a whole movie? He didn't do anything, just kept running. What's the reason for him to get so much success? There are only two: paranoia and luck. If you love this film again, you have to admit that luck accounts for an absolute proportion. Even if you get the love, you have to wait. There is only one reason for the screenwriter to set up so much luck-the history of the United States. As for the various major events of, there is almost no inspirational significance because we all know that in reality no one can produce luck like Forrest.
Maybe some friends are inspired by his spirit and moved. I respect this, but according to the above objective It is true that Forrest Gump cannot be regarded as an inspirational film, like "Two Smoke Guns". With the help of gangsters as the background, it actually tells a wonderful story full of drama, but you can't say that it is a gangster movie.
As for the sentence life is like a box of chocolates, I’m politely saying: nonsense, I translate it into four words that everyone has been listening to since birth: the impermanence of life is not even a single motto. Inspirational meaning,
so I am confused that this movie basically has no resonance with Chinese audiences. "When Happiness Knocks on the Door" is also an American story, but the elements of suffering for livelihood and striving for the happiness of the son can resonate and have a tear-jerking effect. But how does Forrest move everyone? Is it that everyone has an IQ of 75 and feels the same? I can understand that some people just eat this set-just like I just eat the "True Love First" routine no matter how fake it is-but give high scores on such a large scale across the country? I think it’s the follow-up effect that accounts for a large proportion of
Tom Hanks’s performance. I must admit that it’s impeccable, but I have doubts about winning the actor with this film. I don’t question his acting skills but the role of Forrest. It’s not difficult to play technically, not much stronger than Zheng Zeshi’s fat cat. Horizontal comparison: Dustin Hoffman, who also plays a special group, deserves to be crowned the actor by shaping the rainman. Vertical comparison: Tom Hanks’s role in "Philadelphia" is far more difficult than Forrest is well-deserved to win the actor, but in Forrest Gump? I can only say that this role does not reflect the level of Tom Hanks. It is better to be awarded to Tim Robbins in the same year. In
summary, the film’s social significance to the United States, screenwriting structure, and visual effects are each given a star. Tom Hanks's performance is impeccable but accepted. The role is limited to half stars. I personally think that three stars are half enough.
View more about Forrest Gump reviews
