In fact, Thor and Captain America, who appeared in 2011, are more important than Iron Man, Hulk, etc. in the "Avengers", with a more "correct" bloodline or background. After all, Thor was born in a Protoss family, but his head is easy to be hot, his personality is impulsive, and he ended up in the world like a marshal of the Canopy of our country, but after all, his blood is good. Captain America is a government background, professional and regular army, easy to manage, strong execution, and as a "captain", how can he be regarded as a middle-level manager. But the movies of the two heroes are very weak. "Thor" first appeared on the stage and thundered to the audience. First of all, the appearance of the big players in the gods is so thunderous. How do you see how it looks like a costume made of foam? This appearance is not good, no matter how to toss it later. Thor's hammer is really not cool enough, and the power has not seen the expected action special effects, the action is so few, I am really sorry for the audience looking forward to the big scene. In terms of the plot, it is very vulgar, but the director has made the plot very stable and made no major mistakes. The characterization of the characters is also very simple and clear, such as Thor's recklessness, his brother Rocky's gloomy, but too symbolic. However, Hemsworth, who starred in Thor’s ability, is really limited. He played this role too flat. The charisma of the whole film is robbed by Rocky. Although in superhero movies, the opposite angle is more attractive. It's commonplace, but the film is more based on Thor's weakness. The whole "Thor" always gave me the feeling of a movie with insufficient budget. From the styling to the special effects, it did not have the feeling of a blockbuster, and the production did not appear to be sophisticated and attentive enough. The level of the actors was also uneven, which made me feel very Regret.
From the perspective of toys, animations and character history, "Captain America" can be called the "Avengers" big brother-level figure, and finally made a grand appearance in 2011, but it turned out to be more "thunder" than Thor. Captain America’s experience is already the main theme, so the main theme of the film is not surprising, but I can’t imagine it being so unpretentious in the plot, so stable in style, that it is so willing to be the "Avengers" "Foregrounding. What age is it, there are heroes chasing enemy planes in the plot, and when they are about to take action, they have to wait for the story of a beautiful girl giving a kiss. Although as a sci-fi superhero movie, it does not need to be too connected to history with the background of World War II, but the film is too detached. In fact, I think it’s not a problem that the technology is super developed. This is a style of inheriting comics, but From the clues, I still think the film should have a better performance. Look at how "Watchmen" cuts into history, that is called level; see how "Unscrupulous Miscellaneous Army" jokes about history, that is called style. Similar to "Thor", Evans's acting skills are also somewhat difficult to support the big scene. Although he is a very "positive" role, I think that such a just and awe-inspiring role in "Superman" can be filled with Christopher Reeve's interpretation. The charm and the dullness of Evans's performance is also regrettable. However, perhaps the release of "Captain America" itself was a bit embarrassing. When it was released, public opinion was already talking about "Avengers", and it did not forget to add a trailer egg at the end, so the whole film gave people the feeling of being on the scene. Hurry up to tell the story of Captain America, especially some stories about him and Iron Man and his father, and then rush him in modern times to save the world with a bunch of superheroes.
Although hero movies largely look at special effects, we can find that successful hero movies can only stand out if they have some brilliance in character creation and actor performance. For example, "Spiderman" fully shows the protagonist's mortal troubles and inner struggle with darkness. Toby Maguire has played a very beloved big boy feeling; the old version of "Batman" has changed several actors Nothing feels at all, Nolan replaced Bell, made the style dark and personalized, and created a more three-dimensional, more twisted Batman, which immediately rose to a level; not to mention "Iron Man", you can imagine Xiao Tang Is the Iron Man replaced by Ni? The problem with both "Thor" and "Captain America" is that the plot is not simple, but vulgar; the protagonist is not simple, but mediocre, causing the overall standard and style of the two blockbusters to be boring. In any case, these two blockbusters have gathered all the members of the "Avengers", so that the 2012 "Avengers" has a strong sultry expectation. The financial investment in this film should be sufficient, so There should be no need to worry about hot special effects. In the plot, what we know now is that a group of heroes are likely to clashed with Thorta, facing such a contradictory angle that is already quite attractive in Thor, how do the heroes who defend the earth take action? Do you still rely on Little Downey to come forward and tell a story?
View more about Captain America: The First Avenger reviews
