Regarding the theme of this film, such as the bottlenecks and limitations of scientific development, I won't say much about the clichés. It is like a concise sociological popular book, showing the process of Emperor Caesar's establishment of a new order and a new empire from a barrenness (according to the original work, this is an epic from nothing to growth to destruction), like a miniature of history Model-you see its English name is Rise of the Planet of the Apes, I guess it was inspired by Rise and fall of the Third Reich ("The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich"). However, from the first point of view, perhaps it is more appropriate to call it the “great cause of party building”, because it vividly shows how a group of unarmed but angry proletariat is under the leadership of a wise and handsome leader. Spreading blood, resisting oppression, and inflicting cruel revenge on the enemy-and in the end the people are the masters of the country and dominate the governance of the property class.
When the civilized Caesar first went to prison, he thought he could sit and eat fruit and fruit in a friendly manner, but the orangutans in other cells, that is, the compatriots who multiplied with his blood, were rudely stripped off without saying a word. His beloved coat (perhaps exploding his chrysanthemum), the great pain turned him into a broken-winged angel. He learned from the pain, determined to lead his compatriots out of this stupid, insensitive, and enslaved state, and complete the great rejuvenation of the orangutan family. The image of Caesar, the wise man in contemplation and entanglement, instantly overlaps with such great men as Mandela, Gandhi, Chairman O, and a strong breath of the main melody. Especially at the end, it also has a very wonderful foreshadowing: the cold enemy, the innocent pilot, wearing a blood-stained shirt, spread the virus to all parts of the world-it turns out that even the main theme of the film should be cautious. The ingenuity of no trace: some enemies seem to have not been wiped out, but the death knell has been sounded, the power of ID is infinite, not that it is not reported, the time has not come.
Compared with the powerful aura of the orangutans, the several human characters in this film are simply weak, which fully demonstrates how fragile and insignificant the decadent and degraded landlord class is in front of the revolutionary masses. James Franco is an audience perspective, and his appearance has not changed in the past ten years. The Indian girl exists to persuade the audience that the male pig did not pass through the "Marx My Love" crew. Tom Fieldon, once thought he was suitable for droogs roles, but his heart was not strong enough, pitiful was far more terrible than terrible, completely incomparable to De Niro's "Poor Streets" portrayed in "Poor Streets" after doing bad things and being proud The little bastard, there is still a long, long way to go before Gene Hackman, Ben Kingsley's kind of subtle and sophisticated demons.
Because of their full set off, the awesomeness of several orangutan actors is simply hard to measure. Especially when I saw the four orangutans taking the lead in making troubles, namely leaders, military divisions, thugs, and surrendered bandit leaders, all glaring at the camera, like a group photo taken by the Standing Committee of O. The apes passages in the film are very enjoyable, like the reappearance of a classic silent film, with a large lens capacity. Later, I checked the information and found out that Andy Sekis, who did motion capture for Caesar, played Gollum and King Kong, two monsters destined to go down in history. Next, I will be in the motion capture blockbuster "The Adventures of Tintin". "Playing as Captain Adok. Some movie fans respectfully call him the contemporary Chaplin, because he can convey the richest information with only his body and eyes. The Oscar does not award him only because the judges are so stupid that they don't explain. Since the introduction of the sound, the film has no longer been so elegant and concise. The original directors racked their brains to present information on the screen to be replaced by extremely noisy voices, and there are fewer and fewer outstanding actors like him.
This script seems to be silly and unattractive to many people. It is also an orangutan. It looks like the foreign atmosphere in the 2001 Space Odyssey. I feel that many so-called literary and artistic youths deliberately ignore the awesomeness of this typical Hollywood silly film. In fact, it is not easy to tell simple stories. Nowadays, popular themes-first works, such as the Spanish "Buried Alive", privately thought that although "Buried Alive" was creative, it was useless after the plot unfolded. I just abused the protagonist blindly. I almost thought I was watching "Desire".
What kind of script is considered a good basic skill? I think it should be like this film. Watching the film is like holding back urine. During the process, there are many twists and turns, and many social problems such as Alzheimer’s disease (my relatives are suffering from this disease and feel deeply), desperate young people People (I’m...) wait, the emotions that the audience has been unable to release finally poured out heartily after the deafening "NO!"-I think the mainstay of the movie script is not the idea of the sword. The false frame and the philosophical speculation of groaning without illness, not to mention the shaking shots of the underground directors and the unreasonable marginal characters. It is valuable to concentrate on writing ordinary stories to be extraordinary, and to extend simple ideas to the extreme is moving.
View more about Rise of the Planet of the Apes reviews
