The paradox of justice

Wallace 2021-10-20 17:27:10

When the audience chewed on popcorn and watched with joy, the handsome Bell kills so many "bad guys", the director's point of view is self-evident-what he did is just. Therefore, the male protagonist can use the most beautiful posture to kill so many people with a serial gun, and even cruelly cut off the face of the "bad guy", it looks very cool. The audience likes it very much, because the male protagonist is clearly defending the dignity of human emotions, and the right of humans to have emotions cannot be deprived. With the support of this value judgment, the cruel killing has become so beautiful.

In my opinion, the most controversial scene in the film comes from the male protagonist facing the group of revolutionary soldiers who have been besieged and suppressed, choosing to kill the soldiers sent by the government to save the revolutionary army. Facing the group of emotional revolutionary soldiers, he couldn’t even bear to execute a torture, and it was so difficult to kill a puppy—you see, how beautiful and benevolent human emotions are, this The emotion of time is entirely love. But this kind of emotion, in front of the soldiers in power, completely invalidated. The hero kills, kills, kills... At this time, the hero's emotions may become anger and hatred. This is the power of emotion, and emotion itself is the standard of values. If emotion as a standard of values ​​is essentially dependent on rational judgment, then what is the judgment of the male protagonist at this time? That is, emotion is an indispensable part of human beings, and any behavior that deprives it of it is wrong. Therefore, he is obliged to kill and save more human beings.

At the beginning, the reason why the rulers chose to eliminate people's emotions was to prevent war. Seriously, this goal is basically achieved. Except for the very few revolutionary soldiers, the earth is really peaceful. In order to prevent war, mankind can lose freedom-this is the opinion of the ruler. To prevent war, this goal seems to be completely just. But the way to achieve this goal violates human nature and is therefore unjust.

In order to maintain the existence of emotion, the revolutionaries launched a war against the ruler, which seems to be just. But launching a war itself is unjust—don’t tell me that the war here to eliminate centralized rule is just, because emotions themselves will bring more wars, and safeguard the existence of emotions. Can it be justified? ?

If emotion is a symbol of human freedom, this statement is undoubtedly empty and hopeless.

To kill for the purpose of justice-such a thing has happened too much. However, it now seems that justice is just a kind of paradox, because human beings cannot make an ultimate value judgment on their own emotions, and will only do some crazy domination or revenge in order to maintain the emotions themselves. So at the end of the movie, a wicked smile appeared on the corner of the actor's mouth—the real war has just begun.

Regarding all of this, I just want to say with a trace of self-deprecating and sorrowful contempt that the humans in this film can lose their emotions as long as a small bottle of drugs-such a fragile chemical function is the pride of humans. Emotions. Perhaps one day, humans will invent many drugs that stimulate emotions: red films produce love, white films produce sadness, blue films produce melancholy, green films produce happiness... Then, how will human beings face themselves? What about Rong's emotions?

Until then, what is justice?

View more about Equilibrium reviews

Extended Reading
  • Issac 2021-10-20 19:02:05

    The modern version of "Nineteen Eighty Four" is nothing but a perfect ending, relying on an invulnerable hero.

  • Clement 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    The degree of boring and nonsense of this film is that just making the master's handsome shots into a dynamic album is also just as interesting~~ The most terrible thing is that if the master is really sweeping so much, then this movie is at least half shorter~ ~~Tsk! I love your naked upper body more than your well-dressed face ← this is the biggest attraction! 【roll!

Equilibrium quotes

  • DuPont: The gun katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The gun kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the master of the gun katas an adversary not to be taken lightly.

  • [trying to convince a group of rebels that he's letting them escape]

    John Preston: Go. Go, damn you!

    [sees another rebel being shot and knows this group will be next]

    John Preston: Get out of here, God damn it! If you don't, you're dead!

    Rebel: Don't do it. He'll shoot us in the back.

    John Preston: If I was gonna shoot you, I'd shoot you in the face. Now go.