Love from technical analysis

Gracie 2021-10-20 17:26:46

If someone love you unconditionally? should you have the responsibility to love him/her back?
If this person is beautiful/handsome, maybe the answer is easy to answer. If the person is rich/talented, the answer is not difficult to answer.
If she/he is not amazing, sparse and ordinary, and poor, then what will be the answer?
If a cute kitten and puppy are faithful to you, you will love back.
If it's a strong, funny Autobot Bumblebee, you will definitely be looking for it.
But if it is horrible, ugly, disgusting, but loves you as pure, sincere, forever, touching ugly man/woman, or mangy, alien, Decepticon, etc., it will arouse the so-called in your heart responsibility? Or it’s a same-sex, an old man or a child who fell in love with you... You would say: oh, pls stop, it's crazy.

I think this is what AI wants to question us behind its innocent appearance (maybe Spielberg I feel that Kubrick’s question is too philosophical and sharp, so I put such a beautiful coat on it.). Is love conditional or unconditional? Is it something that needs to be repaid, or is it consensual? When desperate love falls on you, should you be happy or afraid? When love becomes artificial, should we believe it or reject it? When an object you think (is a robot also an object? Is it a self-aware toothbrush?) has feelings and falls in love with you, what kind of emotions should you respond with? If a person has three ears, is it possible that you will fall in love with him? What about the four ears? How about 100 ears?

Too complicated! Isn't it? Our love is hierarchical.
Can it be defined in this way? Love: refers to a biological individual, for another of the same race, physical health, does not lack any external organs, the opposite sex or the same sex under special circumstances, is produced by an individual of the same sex, essentially based on chemical substances, in the brain It is a kind of feeling that is willing to be close for a long time, expresses pleasing, full-hearted, and expects the other party to give the same emotional output. And its extension is much more complicated. It covers almost all behaviors since a biological species has self-awareness, including the formation of clan (protection and possession of love, and loved ones) and the formation of war ( Attacks on people who try to grab love), the formation of a country (extended to the protection of love between a community, and the attack on foreign races), the formation of the family (responsibility for love, the generation of morality), etc. .

For the time being to deny the question at the beginning of our article, what are the conditions for love?
Take lovebridge’s dating conditions on BBS to analyze:
Photo, height and weight: Generally speaking, if you can make the top ten headlines, the photo you can get is necessary, and the height of 1.65/1.80 and above is a bonus. The innocent/delicate appearance makes people feel happy, and the nice/muscular appearance makes it pleasing to the eye. The plump/fat body differs from person to person -> So the standardization of appearance or external organs is a necessary condition for love.
Prestigious universities, graduate students, state-owned enterprises/foreign companies, 9K/M, have houses and cars: Generally speaking, as long as there are one or more of these points, the number of couples will increase by orders of magnitude. -> The ability to build a stable, long-term survival/enjoyment (different from person to person) foundation is the prerequisite for producing long-term closeness, expressing pleasing, full-heartedness, and expecting the other party to give the same emotion.
Please attach a photo in the letter -> Love is for both parties and needs primitive stimulating substances.
...
So AI shows us such a scene: the material that produces love is simulated by the computer of its production, object, and duration. However, they did not get the same amount of return. Mommy doesn't love David as much as he loves Martin.
why?
In my opinion, it is very simple. As we analyzed above, there are too many conditions for love, too complicated, and so many different levels.
So many variables. How can it be so easy to simulate.
Technology needs to be improved.

View more about A.I. Artificial Intelligence reviews

Extended Reading
  • Beau 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    [B-] Perhaps the most boring big production of Kubrick and Spielberg? Cyber-thrillers and family ethics films, despite the obvious stylistic differences between paragraphs, I still think that the most tender and fairy-tale parts are what Kubrick envisioned, not what Spiebberg put in. The opening thriller scene is filled with a lot of mirror reflection and refraction shots, plus the eerie soundtrack and the best children's performances, successfully carves the Uncanny Valley effect into the image. The middle and back sections are the bizarre future world, the carnival of imagination and the film industry, and the image system is extremely unified (except for the middle section of hunting robots). But the ideological system is extremely fragmented, switching back and forth between fairy tales and science fiction, making the story extremely complicated and the rhythm extremely broken. I can't continue to explore more deep things, I can only stay on the surface of commercial gimmicks, relying on "skilled" emotional descriptions to exchange the audience's self-movement, and for me, these 146 minutes are really like 2000. long.

  • Alisha 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    Quotation: Toys must be broken to be fun. All roads lead to Yandu.

A.I. Artificial Intelligence quotes

  • [Henry arrives home with the Mecha David]

    Monica: Henry, what are you doing?

    Henry Swinton: [Henry holds onto Monica] I love you. Don't kill me.

  • [Henry and Monica discuss about David looking like a real child]

    Monica: I mean, Henry, did you see his face? He's - He's so real. But he's not.

    Henry Swinton: No, he's not.

    Monica: I mean, inside he's like all the rest, isn't he?

    Henry Swinton: A hundred miles of fiber, yeah.

    Monica: But outside, he just looks so real - Like he is a real child.

    Henry Swinton: A Mecha child

    Monica: A child.