But "Angels and Demons" is different. Although it is still trying to supplement art history and religion history, the capacity is not so big, and most of them are well-known scientists and artists; the author himself has created small climaxes in his writings, such as killing a red man every hour. The Bishop also showed a mysterious Illuminati symmetry brand to grab the reader's heart, and finally created a big explosion from the sky and uncovered the most unexpected true face of the event to completely release the readers who have been hanging on. heart of. It can be said that the novel itself is full of various elements and gimmicks of commercial blockbusters. As long as the movie avoids the sudden switching of preaching and clues, it will look good.
Facts have proved that Ron Howard let go of his hands and feet this time to make a highly watchable entertainment blockbuster. The background explanations of science, religion and art are all downplayed, and the "popularization of knowledge" is at an acceptable level; nor is it focused on the big question of whether science and religion are right or wrong. Try to beautify it visually and auditorily, and the final big bang is technically very beautiful, like a supernova rising, which is impressive. The soundtrack is also just right to add a touch of compactness to the part that should have felt boring, which makes people feel nervous. As far as suspense films are concerned, if the audience can't easily guess the ending without knowing it beforehand, but in the end it can make people realize and feel wonderful and beautiful, then it should be a success.
East, who has never read the original book next to me, said he understood it, but he didn't think it highlighted the meaning of the two "angels and demons". In my opinion, the biggest regret is that the director abandoned the section of Professor Langdon who jumped from the helicopter into the Tiber River. This book was finished when I was in college using the boring time of returning home by train. Three or four years have passed, and many plots have been blurred. The only thing that impressed me was the last ten thousand meters jump by Professor Langdon. Actually still survived in catastrophe. It shocked me that year. It can be said that I had been waiting for this jump for the first two hours. I really wanted to see how the director and Lao Tang behaved, but at last I watched Ivan get on the helicopter alone, very disappointed. .
Speaking of this, the problem of the nympho is coming up, and you must not forget the biggest and biggest highlight of the film, that is Ivan! Although he was a little blessed, I was still intoxicated by the stiff figure under the missionary uniform (uniform temptation~~~), beautiful voice and tactful English. Ivan is here, I am transparent as an old Tang and beautiful scientist, regardless of appearance or performance. In Dan Brown’s writings, villains seem to have never been full-fledged villains. The motives for doing bad things are “politically correct” and they have strong beliefs to support them in completing all their “careers”. The papal attendant is also such a person. He loves his "father" and his religion, and he does not hesitate to protect it with extreme means. And Ivan used his firm eyes with melodious voice to express this pitiful behind-the-scenes man in a three-dimensional manner. Especially in the end he suddenly realized that the cardinals had actually seen through him, they suddenly understood but calm eyes, and then poured oil on themselves in an attempt to self-immolate the scene, that paranoid and desperate eyes gushing Then, I successfully dedicated a glamorous performance, and I swayed and said to east that I was going to cry~
To be honest, I don't really appreciate the so-called acting skills of actors, only my intuitive likes and dislikes. This has something to do with the appearance of the actors but has nothing to do with it. This should be a kind of comprehensive charm. I like the younger Tom Hanks. Even the younger he is not handsome, but he has a kind of righteousness and aura, and now he is older, that kind of aura is like a stomach and eye bags. It has grown and gradually disappeared, making people feel the suspicion of being "Lian, quite old". Ivan is not the most handsome actor, but in my eyes it is radiant, from the lost youth in "Train Guessing" to the Jedi Knight in "Star Wars" to the down-and-out writer of "Moulin Rouge", Going to the strange dad in "Big Fish", there are "Dumb Singer", "Velvet Gold Mine", "Black Hawk Down", "Miss Potter", various types of characters, rarely called People are disappointed, and the light shines for thousands of years. I think this is the type of actor, this is the talent, this is the dazzling star, this is the combination of angel and devil~~~ I have a big star in this movie, which is for Ivan.
View more about Angels & Demons reviews
