Recommended reason: so superficial and profound, so wretched and profound, so bastard and profound, so careless and profound. Title: "Burn after Reading" Director: The Coen Brothers Original: Stanfield Turner Starring: George Clooney, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Frances McDumond, Tey Jelda Swinton Production Time: Reading in 2008 Home: The singer in the stone garden. This movie makes me laugh. The story is simple, in a word: a murder caused by a compact disc. In the movie, Brad Pitt was brutally smashed, and John Malkovich smashed people in the street for five steps, but it still makes people laugh so much that they can’t help themselves. "Burn" is so paradoxical. Is it a spy movie? Yes, the story revolves around a memoir CD lost by a former CIA member. However, the content of the CD has no information value at all. Is it a comedy? Yes, it is indeed a lot of fun to see a group of men and women play with their little cleverness and make their lives lose control and collapse step by step. However, there were at least two divorces and three casualties. The men were all messed up, and the slightly desirable ones were all wickedly dead, while the women were neither loyal nor beautiful nor gentle. People are discouraged. So it is a tragedy? Yes, it exudes despair from inside the bones. However, didn't it mean that someone finally got what they wanted when they closed it? Linda, the female employee of the fitness center, received the coveted cosmetic surgery fee. It was for the money that she turned the river into the ocean and caused the world chaos. After the owner of the extortion attempt failed, she drove the car to the Russian embassy with a kick of the gas pedal, in order to treason. The gesture of the person handed in the CD-ROM. She is an out-and-out two hundred and five. As for the actors, first of all, I want to congratulate Peter for taking one step closer to the word "great". In the film, he plays Linda's colleague and accomplice, another 250 role, to this end, Peter spared no effort to contribute a variety of low-intellectual behaviors and expressions. In particular, there was a scene where he excitedly said to Linda with his childish voice and nasal, "I got his phone number, I got his phone number", and I was swaying around like a robot, and I just laughed. To tears. How can you really do it? This is the prodigal son who turned all living creatures upside down in "The Legend of Autumn". So, it’s nothing great for an actor to be handsome all the way to forty-five, but he can truly be called great unless he is imprisoned by this handsome. It’s not mean. I just thought that Hua Tsai was as tireless and handsome to this day as he was. However, if it hadn’t been for the scenes of the early days of "Heaven If Love", he would really be just a handsome and qualified male artist, and the same is true for antique vases. It's a vase, right? There is also Clooney, the handsome man, who didn't forget to rush upstairs to take the posture mat he brought after he had a big fight with his lover. It was wonderful. And Markovic is wearing a scarlet nightgown, carrying a sharp axe, spraying his leg hair, and walking in a murderous manner. In my opinion, it is definitely not too much to be included in the top ten anti-hero images. These actors, bye Which one of them is not a hotly commanding material? With a cheer, at least 800 directors are vying to cast them into the super invincible savior of the universe, but they are gathered together in a movie just to ask them to interpret the wretchedness? The Coen brothers were so unexpected. remember? The most horrifying detail in "Ice Blood Storm" is not that the passerby was headshot at close range, but the pair of striped socks worn on the feet of a corpse when the head was flushed down and stuffed into the wood chipper. Last winter, I saw the end of "Old Nowhere" and watched the cast rise. I was so dazed that I thought I was drunk, so I went to the DVD jacket to look for the next disc. Yes, because they are the Coen brothers, we don't have to expect compassion. In the same way, there is no need to expect sympathy, redemption, values, and transcendence. All they provide are calm gaze, scuffing eyes, and a bitterness that has nothing to do with them. It may be that I think too much, but in the two-hundred-and-five-hundred-and-five-hundred-feeling toss in the film, what I see is the common absurdity of mankind—the lack of meaning, the straightforwardness of death, the vainness of sex, people, in the lens of the Coen brothers. Here, it is totally without dignity. However, it is right to have no dignity. It has always been us, taking ourselves too seriously. The world is not benevolent, and everything is a humble dog. This is definitely not the case for a moment, and it is definitely not the case for generations. This is the eternal situation of mankind. If it is not sincere enough, strong enough, and calm enough, no filmmaker is willing, daring and able to touch this, I think. Blood and death will not be remembered longer than a clever joke. There is nothing new under the sun. Knowing the vain and going all out, this is the lack of human heart, this is all the greatness and sadness of mankind. God does not intend to save the 6.5 billion two hundred and five on the surface of the earth. Everything depends on us. 2009-1-6 Value and transcendence, all they provide is icy gaze, scuffing eyes, and a bitterness that has nothing to do with them. It may be that I think too much, but in the two-hundred-and-hundred-and-five-hundred-feeling toss in the film, what I see is the common absurdity of mankind—the lack of meaning, the straightforwardness of death, the vainness of sex, people, in the lens of the Coen brothers. Here, it is totally without dignity. However, it is right to have no dignity. It has always been us, taking ourselves too seriously. The world is not benevolent, and everything is a humble dog. This is definitely not the case for a moment, and it is definitely not the case for generations. This is the eternal situation of mankind. If it is not sincere enough, strong enough, and calm enough, no filmmaker is willing, daring and able to touch this, I think. Blood and death will not be remembered longer than a clever joke. There is nothing new under the sun. Knowing the vain and going all out, this is the lack of human heart, this is all the greatness and sadness of mankind. God does not intend to save the 6.5 billion two hundred and five on the surface of the earth. Everything depends on us. 2009-1-6 Value and transcendence, all they provide is icy gaze, scuffing eyes, and a bitterness that has nothing to do with them. It may be that I think too much, but in the two-hundred-and-five-hundred-and-five-hundred-feeling toss in the film, what I see is the common absurdity of mankind—the lack of meaning, the straightforwardness of death, the vainness of sex, people, in the lens of the Coen brothers. Here, it is totally without dignity. However, it is right to have no dignity. It has always been us, taking ourselves too seriously. The world is not benevolent, and everything is a humble dog. This is definitely not the case for a moment, and it is definitely not the case for generations. This is the eternal situation of mankind. If it is not sincere enough, strong enough, and calm enough, no filmmaker is willing, daring and able to touch this, I think. Blood and death will not be remembered longer than a clever joke. There is nothing new under the sun. Knowing the vain and going all out, this is the lack of human heart, this is all the greatness and sadness of mankind. God does not intend to save the 6.5 billion two hundred and five on the surface of the earth. Everything depends on us. 2009-1-6
View more about Burn After Reading reviews
