equipment do really understand the kind of B
movies are basically two kinds:
one is due to the limited nature of our lives, and our spiritual experience depletion, the generation of moviegoers into the scene did not have to extend The possibility of its life, so as to achieve the purpose of making viewers happy, and then let them pay for this pleasure, and finally those producers achieve their commercial goals. Whether it's action movies, horror cloth, romance movies, all kinds of things.
One is out of an expression need of the creator. This is the same as poets writing poems, painters painting, and singers singing. No matter what he expresses is his thinking or his aesthetics, he is an expression of being loyal to his heart. He expresses his interior through movies, and he also extends his interior through those who resonate in the audience. Of course, this is also the common characteristic of those sincere artists.
The former is a product, and the latter is a work. The former gesture for us is, take a look, here is thrilling, there is horror, there is romance, come buy it. The latter's posture is that this is my work, so I don't want to see it.
In this way, the former seems to be talking about commercial films, while the latter seems to be those art films. I didn't say so absolutely. Because in the process of striving for profit, commercial films have already possessed a certain degree of artistry. As for the so-called art films, for the cost of creators, they will also lower their profile to a certain extent, accommodate the tastes of as many people as possible, and accommodate others as well as themselves. Therefore, it also has a certain degree of commerciality.
"Puppet Life", I think it is biased towards the latter.
After watching this movie, I was emotionally excited, but I was confused in my thoughts. The excitement is that this movie is very interesting. Wang Xiaobo and his elders don’t just talk about it. People need to do something interesting while they’re alive. It can be said that this series of participants have done it. What is confusing to me is that I vaguely feel that this movie has a lot of metaphors about metaphysics, and I can't perceive them clearly.
The following trial analysis is focused on attracting ideas.
Self-lost•Who is whose puppet?
Self-lost•Who is whose puppet?
The metaphor of this movie is not single. For example, why is there a 7 and a half floor? Of course, it has a funny purpose. It is not difficult to see the oppression of the well-dressed white-collar workers in the so-called urban civilization. I can't help but feel sympathy. .
Of course the core is the "puppet". The movie echoes the theme of puppets as a puppeteer.
When Cusack learned to fully control Makovic, Cusack invaded Makovic’s head and occupied his body. At the same time, he also enjoyed the horse’s fame and fortune. At the same time, he was captured by the horse’s fame and fortune. When Na was about to leave her, he also said, if I leave the horse's body, I will have nothing. Will she still be with me?
Who can tell who is whose puppet?
It is the materialistic, vast and complex world that makes people feel so small and loses the most basic self-confidence that they should have.
Think about the people who are addicted to online games nowadays. Don't they also use the form of online simulation to make an attempt to "become Markovic"?
Looking back, when we asked about our ideals when we were young, we always answered with this sentence: I want to be like XX. This XX may be Einstein, Picasso, Nobel, Napoleon, or even Hitler. In "Two Three No Guess", the boy wants to be a tyrant, and the girl wants to be a pie. Of course, this kind of statement may be used as a reference to a class of people, and it is not meant to be a copy or clone of XX, but it is not difficult to see that this kind of sentence pattern inadvertently already contains the embarrassment of "being Markovic". orientation.
Looking back on history, the more chaotic and troubled the era, the more prevalent religion and superstition. Among them, the most representative is Taoism. The ultimate goal is to become a fairy. What is immortal? The so-called immortal does not mean being pure-hearted and low-spirited, renunciation from oneself, or even renunciation from the genus of human beings, and becoming a product or freak in a fantasy. Why do they want to become immortals? Isn't it because they don't want to face all the things they have to face? What is this essence? escape!
Speaking of evasion, it is not difficult to see the similarities between those who drink, smoke, and take drugs and the Cusacks. Those who indulge in all kinds of ecstasy, ecstasy and ecstasy all escape, aren't they all out of betrayal of self and the environment in which the self is located? The essence is a consistent departure from oneself.
But these detachment-self-realization methods are different.
One is to become a puppet, what is a puppet? Dictionary: "Wooden people in puppet shows; metaphors for people or organizations that are manipulated and cannot stand on their own. The key is to be controlled."
One is to become a walking corpse. Excluding the skin of the soul, only the physical level of survival is retained. The difference with puppets is that they are not controlled.
At first glance, it seems that it is more free than puppets. mistaken. Freedom without soul perception cannot be regarded as freedom, that is the freedom of beasts! In other words, the freedom chanted by those noble souls since ancient times is a concept that exists relative to humans, which means that only those with souls can have freedom.
Formal non-freedom does not necessarily limit spiritual freedom, and spiritual non-freedom does not matter to formal freedom.
The former are like Zhou Wenwang, Li Ao, and Mandela, and they can write books in prison. This shows that as long as a person is free inside, no one can imprison him. Not to mention the latter! Those who are doing nothing in the camps, do nothing, are there not a lot of them?
To judge whether a person is truly free, the prerequisite is spiritual independence. Otherwise, he is either a puppet or a walking corpse.
Look at how many people in this world can speak of independent personality and personal will? Can you do your own thing purely, speak your own words, and think about your own things?
Mediocre people, who is not a puppet in life, and who is not a puppet in life.
As a puppet, it is inevitable that there are many farces. Try it out: The
puppet's farce
.
For example, when Keef did it with Markovic twice, who did she do it with? I would like to ask one more question, who is the source of the feeling she got, isn't this the biggest ridicule of the puppet?
"I want to get into someone else's head and use his body to date someone I love, while at the same time my wife and the orangutan are locked in a cage at home. What kind of life is this!"
Although Diaz and Cusack both borrowed Markovic's body and did it with Keef. But Cusack is more pathetic. Why did Diaz just borrow Markovic’s little dick? Cusack borrowed more than just little dick. Cusack borrowed Markovic’s body and a character referred to by "it". This scene is similar to that when Yin Zhiping went to the Little Dragon Girl when she was covered with a tissue.
The former only uses the body as a tool of expression, which is no different from borrowing a cucumber from a neighbor. The latter is more than just "borrowing". The dislocation of body and soul behind this always gives people the feeling of dirty and incest. Suppose someone would say something like this: "Hello, buddy, I want to use your body to satisfy my lover's sexual needs, don't you?".
(Seriously, don't laugh. Oh, tell me! I'm talking about it!)
The comparison between the two scenes arranged before and after the screenwriter is really a bit bold and cynical! I believe that when he wrote here back then, he must be complacent, thinking that he had molested the entire human race, and kept smiling triumphantly. It must be happier than when I watched a movie.
who am I?
who am I?
"Who am I yesterday? Who am I today?"
You ask me, who am I asking?
Be yourself, "Don't let the weak soul be the last dish." "If life has no meaning in the first place, and I have no choice but this unintentional life, then it is still the choice I want most."
So, "Be brave to be yourself." (All quotes in this section are in Nietzsche)
Be brave to be yourself, so that what you endure as an individual is meaningful. Especially the pain of loneliness that we endure, and the painful loneliness.
On the back of order / crap
on the back of order / crap
I have cultivated a habit, it is to see a good movie, watercress immediately to see if there are soybean oil write reviews. If I have already written everything I want to write or write very well, then I will stop writing and put them on top.
So far, I looked through it and felt that what I wanted to say has not been written out yet, so I have this article.
View more about Being John Malkovich reviews
