1. Look at the stupid male protagonist who has been diss in his heart in the first half, how does it fit the image of the protagonist of a disaster movie! What I want to see is how the witty human beings represented by the protagonist will survive when the social order no longer exists. 2. I saw half of the most ironic coming. Mistakes made by the country cannot be solved by the military under the shield of human rights, and it is necessary to recruit national volunteers to take the initiative to send the dead to save the people. When I saw this, I understood why this greedy, wretched and stupid person was the protagonist. Because a cheap life can be given up for the family. It is ridiculous for a country to ask these people to come to the rescue. 3. The second half is quite complete. The incitement is relatively accurate. The characters are well-built. The male protagonist is an ordinary little character who is not good anywhere. He doesn't want to be a hero. He wanted to run away from the beginning, but he wants to protect the person he loves, so the scene where he finally cried and said that he was so scared and died was really tear-jerking. When the president finally asked "that person", he was black again. Capitalists have no heart. 4. The Korean film and television industry is amazing, either the cruel realism melting pot Sowon Seven Princesses, or the dreamy sweet love drama. Because the reality is too difficult, do you want to give yourself some psychological comfort?
5. Citizens' trust in government depends on what they do. When disaster occurs, government's ability to maintain social order and emergency response is sufficient to reflect its ability and degree of trust. I am fortunate to be born in a Huaxia family. Pay tribute to the soldiers and medical staff who are fighting on the front line of the fight against the epidemic.
View more about Pandora reviews
