Might must have sunset

If the United States did not exist, the world would have undergone great changes, it would promote historical changes, and allow all human beings to have more room for development. I don't like this director because he obfuscates the public and misleads the public, this documentary is just a tool. The front of the film did tell the truth, and the back was a far-fetched one-sided political propaganda, which finally reduced to a smear film against Obama. But anyway, the value of this controversial documentary is that it can be controversial, so I'm willing to give it three and a half stars. First of all, it is necessary to recognize what history is. Some American scholars in the front of the film still tell the truth: history has a purpose. History must have its own position. A more objective view of history should be that you sing and I will come on stage. Some families are happy and some are sad. History is a story that shows games, gains and losses. It is true that there is no need to accuse the United States of the present with the past, but there is no need to use the present to beautify and obliterate the shame of the old days of the United States. Second, it is necessary to recognize what America is, and what we mean by U.S. imperialism is the U.S. military and government, not the people living on North American soil, an organization, not a nation, race, or people. At present, this organization maintains the power of a small number of capitals in the United States, and represents the interests of a few developed countries in the West worldwide. Today’s America is not the America of the past. Today’s America represents an arrogant and powerful force. Because it is too protective of minority groups, it is scorned by many people who cannot enjoy the benefits. Aside from the debate about the righteousness and the evil of the few, the arrogance formed by their violent strength is objective. And arrogance has been the cause of death for many regimes throughout history. What is arrogance, arrogance is an aggressive attitude away from strength. In the process of greedy possession and making too many enemies, no matter how powerful an organization or group is, it cannot escape disaster. Furthermore, what is fairness and justice? Lincoln's statement really reflects the logic of the great man. There is no absolute fairness and justice in this world, only the matching of strength and distribution. Naturally it is unfair. And justice always belongs to the victor. Fourth, did the United States bring freedom, equality and capitalism? What do French people think when they see this film? The Statue of Liberty was given to Americans by them. What about thinkers since the Enlightenment and the Renaissance? Is the consciousness of human rights created by the United States? In the era after the fall of Constantinople, the power of religion has been squeezed by science, and has gradually stepped down from the altar of human ideology, and humanism has gradually developed rapidly in the rapid development of productive forces. Even if religions are changing, Protestantism makes people link capital accumulation with virtues and adapts well to work. Commercial civilization, while industrial and commercial civilization also brings more desire to expand, of course, this is another topic. And these are nourishing the modern consciousness of freedom, equality, and even civil rights that we see before the birth of the United States. In a word, the film shamelessly puts the progress of human thought on the wall of glory in the United States. Could it be learned from Koreans? Finally, let's talk about the misleading of this film. Many of the shame of the United States are evil from a historical perspective. Indeed, there is no absolute good and evil in history. In my mind, the evil of the United States lies in its current position on China. The clarity of its position also objectively determines the clear position of the Chinese, which must be mutually chosen. The U.S. is indeed unfriendly to China, and has a bad track record, I mean the present. In addition, the film cites some counter-examples to try to overthrow the stubborn disease of racism, but it ignores the relatively high price that the disadvantaged groups have to pay on the road to success. . People do need their own efforts to achieve success, but it does not mean that the system can be ignored without hindering success. In addition, the film compares Mexico and the United States, and says that the people choose the United States. Sorry, the people just choose a relatively better living environment, not the political system, nor do they agree with the political system organization, and even the system is superior. In addition, people who have adapted to a certain environment judge other environments. Isn’t the conclusion obvious, don’t forget that they have “adapted to the environment”. The war part is the most hypocritical, the most disgusting, and it is not even shameful to cover up the truth. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute strength, it has been trying to seize resources and development opportunities, and desperately impose the evil consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! , the film shamelessly puts the progress of human thought on the wall of glory in the United States. Could it be learned from the Koreans? Finally, let's talk about the misleading of this film. Many of the shame of the United States are evil from a historical perspective. Indeed, there is no absolute good and evil in history. In my mind, the evil of the United States lies in its current position on China. The clarity of its position also objectively determines the clear position of the Chinese, which must be mutually chosen. The U.S. is indeed unfriendly to China, and has a bad track record, I mean the present. In addition, the film cites some counter-examples to try to overthrow the stubborn disease of racism, but it ignores the relatively high price that the disadvantaged groups have to pay on the road to success. . People do need their own efforts to achieve success, but it does not mean that the system can be ignored without hindering success. In addition, the film compares Mexico and the United States, and says that the people choose the United States. Sorry, the people just choose a relatively better living environment, not the political system, nor do they agree with the political system organization, and even the system is superior. In addition, people who have adapted to a certain environment judge other environments. Isn’t the conclusion obvious, don’t forget that they have “adapted to the environment”. The war part is the most hypocritical, the most disgusting, and it is not even shameful to cover up the truth. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! , the film shamelessly puts the progress of human thought on the wall of glory in the United States. Could it be learned from the Koreans? Finally, let's talk about the misleading of this film. Many of the shame of the United States are evil from a historical perspective. Indeed, there is no absolute good and evil in history. In my mind, the evil of the United States lies in its current position on China. The clarity of its position also objectively determines the clear position of the Chinese, which must be mutually chosen. The U.S. is indeed unfriendly to China, and has a bad track record, I mean the present. In addition, the film cites some counter-examples to try to overthrow the stubborn disease of racism, but it ignores the relatively high price that the disadvantaged groups have to pay on the way to success. . People do need their own efforts to achieve success, but it does not mean that the system can be ignored without hindering success. In addition, the film compares Mexico and the United States, and says that the people choose the United States, sorry, the people just choose a relatively better living environment, not the political system, nor do they agree with this political system organization, and even the system is superior. In addition, people who have adapted to a certain environment judge other environments. Isn’t the conclusion obvious, don’t forget that they have “adapted to the environment”. The war part is the most hypocritical, the most disgusting, and it is not even shameful to cover up the truth. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! . The U.S. is indeed unfriendly to China, and has a bad track record, I mean the present. In addition, the film cites some counter-examples to try to overthrow the stubborn disease of racism, but it ignores the relatively high price that the disadvantaged groups have to pay on the way to success. . People do need their own efforts to achieve success, but it does not mean that the system can be ignored without hindering success. In addition, the film compares Mexico and the United States, and says that the people choose the United States, sorry, the people just choose a relatively better living environment, not the political system, nor do they agree with this political system organization, and even the system is superior. In addition, people who have adapted to a certain environment judge other environments. Isn't the conclusion obvious? Don't forget that they have "adapted to the environment." The war part is the most hypocritical, the most disgusting, and it is not even shameful to cover up the truth. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! . The U.S. is indeed unfriendly to China, and has a bad track record, I mean the present. In addition, the film cites some counter-examples to try to overthrow the stubborn disease of racism, but it ignores the relatively high price that the disadvantaged groups have to pay on the way to success. . People do need their own efforts to achieve success, but it does not mean that the system can be ignored without hindering success. In addition, the film compares Mexico and the United States, and says that the people choose the United States, sorry, the people just choose a relatively better living environment, not the political system, nor do they agree with this political system organization, and even the system is superior. In addition, people who have adapted to a certain environment judge other environments. Isn’t the conclusion obvious, don’t forget that they have “adapted to the environment”. The war part is the most hypocritical, the most disgusting, and it is not even shameful to cover up the truth. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! Cover the facts. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself! Cover the facts. If the United States has no strategic interests and ideological export purpose, I do not believe that it will make love, donations and the spread of civilized technology for the freedom and well-being of another nation thousands of miles away! And in a murderous way! In fact, the greatness of the United States and its contribution to the world do not need to be expressed in such exaggerated and hypocritical ways. The technological creations of the United States have brought prosperity to the whole world, and promoted civilizations to get rid of the trap of involution within a period of human development. If the United States did not exist at that time, it would be a pity for mankind. But history lies in change. While the United States does possess absolute power, it has always tried to seize resources and development opportunities, desperately trying to impose the consequences of party struggle, internal friction, greed and vicious competition on the entire human race. It is irresponsible and fragile. Sensitive and aggressive. Or what Lincoln said, to today's America, the decline of this country does not lie on the other side of the ocean, but on its interior, itself!