Feel free to chat!

Aaliyah 2022-09-15 19:50:27

The three levels of image/director ability/actor as a whole have almost reached the top level of film history as an art film, but I still put a big "?" on the content and integrity level. Even more harshly, I think the director's will Some were actually broken, and I'll explain why later. This work endows the film with deep artistic charm in terms of details and technology. Wells's use of the camera lens is even more awesome, which can be described as extremely complicated/surprisingly detailed. Most of the film contains lines and plots. In fact, between the dynamic and static state, a relatively unique fast and precise transformation is achieved by capturing the sense of the characters, the objects that carry the content, and the environment. At the level of more complex lens application, I believe it is a very accurate The combination of mirroring (it feels very complex and precise, from the perspective of each scene, the entire film shooting should be a very complex and repetitive process) and editing, to achieve a sense of integration between film images and content, but in fact I think the part with the lines is exactly the part that destroys the director's will, and as another main line of the movie, the part of the woman (I don't know how to define and describe this woman) what she carries is actually the director's will more. It's part of the clarity, it's just that it's more subtle. I believe that the audience interprets the film more from the former, and the latter is only a form of film content, but I think on the contrary, I don't think the director is trying to refract himself through a clear plot, but it is more reasonable It is just a part of the film's appearance, and the real core is a part of the artistic language. It is silent and silent, and it belongs to the art carried by a behavioral level. The soundtrack is great, the script (I'm not even sure if this is a script at all, the script seems weird to me, I find it kind of messy, don't know if anyone would think it's some kind of stream of consciousness, but I personally Negative, I think that the director's will is somewhat dislocated from the version of the film clip, that is, the part clearly defined by the primary and secondary issues I mentioned earlier) is actually a relatively irrelevant part of the film, it is a kind of content subject Instead, there are no lines or content to advance. More scenes, actors, and the director's scheduling are handled very delicately. I think this is the most important part of the movie, because the work is obviously a bit awkward, or it's not. Complete, or not a very complete manifestation of the director's will, the only part that can best carry this director's will is precisely in these scenes without lines or complex lines, they are worthy of deep understanding. Deeply feel and read, as for what these scenes are carrying, I can't say for sure, only Can retain my own sense of it (not even necessarily accurate). This work will raise a question that I have been pondering for a long time, whether the director's will realizes the clear part or the more unclear part. I think the former is a content-driven, and the latter is a more complex one. Level (a kind of presentation that cannot be concretely expressed and described at the spiritual/psychological level), this analogy is actually like the difference between American actors and European actors in terms of performance expression. The former is actually a clear and intuitive expression that we can understand and capture with the naked eye, while the latter is more ambiguous, and it is actually equally clear, but you can’t directly judge with words. , because it actually has some complexities and changes of man himself in it. This work is actually the intersection of these two different logics, and I think the best part is precisely in this vague part, which is non-verbal. Finally, all in all, this is not a complete film, but some of its artistry and technical aspects are ahead of its time. Even in contemporary times, no director has the ability to achieve such an application!

View more about The Other Side of the Wind reviews

Extended Reading

The Other Side of the Wind quotes

  • Male Guest 5: If the audience can't get it then what's the point of even going to the movie?

  • Zimmer: Studying a man like Jake Hannaford, that's an experience. Don't you miss it.