When such a person who rapes and murders children exists, do you still think the death penalty is unnecessary? forget? As Kelteth's novel "Life Without Destiny" has already stated "the impossibility of forgetting". And the movie also denied "forgetting" from the very beginning. It is impossible to forget. People can only move forward on the premise of not forgetting the pain. All forgetting is either self-deception or weakness. To a certain extent, revenge may be more in line with human nature, and "forgiveness" is often the morality of the incompetent. Not to mention "forgotten". The mother of one of the victims in the movie scolded the male protagonist "every time you torture him, you kill your daughter again", but this sentence is extremely terrifying. The cowardly moralist shows incompetence and stupidity in the face of the enemy, so he has no choice but to confuse the world with such ridiculous words, thinking that he has really forgotten, and put himself on the moral high ground, as if in the human nature and morality. As if he was more sublime than the Avengers--Actors--. Vengeance does not bring relief, can ignorance bring relief? To be able to start over and live as if nothing had happened? In the end, the movie doesn't actually give "revenge" a moral justification. However, the actor also said: he "doesn't regret" - because he acted. Here, it is no longer -- or has long gone beyond the superficial categories of morality and right and wrong. The film is just asking: If there is no death penalty, in the face of the extreme situation in the film, will the possibility of achieving justice still exist, and will human nature collapse because of this? So what's your answer? In the face of extreme situations in the movie, "no regrets" may be really appropriate, and at the same time, the death penalty may also be necessary.
--A short review of "Seven Days of Revenge"
View more about 7 Days reviews
