The problem is with the movie, not us

I read both versions of memoir of murderer, it says that police officer Min is the serial killer of the recent murders. Kim killed Min in order to save his daughter. The final reversal is whether Min is dead or not. Who is he?

Another memory is that Kim is a serial killer in all cases, including Min and his daughter, all of them murdered because of his memory disorder. He himself thought Officer Min was a bad guy. This was revealed in the last few minutes of the reversal.

Although it seems that I understand it, when I see the final reversal of each version, I have n question marks in my heart. I read some movie reviews and analysis, and the discussion in the comment area is in full swing. In fact, if a movie requires the audience to watch a lot of others Only by reviewing the film can we spy on some of the director's intentions and ideas, which means that the film itself has problems of expression. Of course, in order to complete the director's great dream of making two completely different stories from one material, it is necessary to hide some details according to the logical needs of different stories. It's because if one is too clear about the logic chain and there is nothing wrong, the other version will definitely go wrong. Therefore, when we see the final reversal or tell the truth, we always feel that something is missing. I understand that this is the director's dream for him. sacrificed

So if you understand that Kim is a dual personality, either the recording is only one paragraph or as long as you think the inference is right, it is right because the director did not intend to explain what is right, he left a lot of unexplained to the audience's own mind Complement the logic chain, for example, another memory. In the end, Jin should be the one who lacked the left brain. It's so strange. If the head CT is not gold, but police officer Min's, how to replace it and when to shoot this logic chain will collapse even more, so these details can only be made up by everyone's own brains

Or that sentence, what you think is right, is reasonable. The director just wanted to convey a point of view through the two versions of the film: memory is unbelievable, another memory that can be tampered with by one's own heart. Prosecutors say Alzheimer's patients will protect themselves Selective screening of one's own memory is actually not only a patient, each of us will be determined by human nature to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. When facing harm, we are often not true and honest. Therefore, when we see the protagonist of a certain drama going through many difficulties and obstacles When we come out and tell the truth after struggling and suffering, we think, "Wow, he has beaten himself and he is great!" In fact, he has beaten the humanity that each of us has. Suddenly I feel that this movie is a bit idealistic "I think, therefore I am". Haha let's talk about it