memory bias

To sort out the timeline: On September 10, Min and Jin had a car accident on the Haiyue Sancha Road. Min left blood, which he found to be type O blood after testing, and deer don't have type O blood, so there must be a corpse in the trunk. On the 11th, Jin called the police and was taken as a joke by the police. Min called Jin from a public phone and confirmed that he was the one who called the police. On the night of the 11th, Kim found the body based on experience and called the police anonymously. On the morning of the 12th, Min arrived at the scene and decided to get Jin, and accidentally met Jin's daughter, so he had a trick in his heart.

The problem here is: the daughter said that on the day of the accident, Jin went to the bamboo forest, but there was mud on the shoes. According to this timeline, the accident was on the 10th, the trip to the reservoir was on the 11th, and there should be mud on the shoes on the 11th. If there is mud on the 10th, what is the reason? I don't understand this place. But the people were definitely not killed by Jin Bingshou, because as he said before, the people he killed were buried in small bamboo forests and would not be thrown into reservoirs. Even if their memory was lost, their habits would not change. And he kills for a different purpose than Min: Kim likes to strangle what he thinks is trash, regardless of gender; Min only strangles women, and is young and beautiful. If Alzheimer's disease is just a memory loss, it can be remedied a little by recording, and eventually it will become impossible to remember. My colleague's grandma, she often forgets that she has eaten, and will keep eating until her family finds out and hurries her to stop. Did I say she wouldn't feel her belly swell? It's even more troublesome if people can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality. It may be mainly because of the hindrance to memory. But Kim Byung-soo in the film seems to have made mistakes in his perception many times: He put his daughter in Min Taizhou's car, and he thought the nun sister was in the car. In fact, nuns don't exist, do they? Jin later returned to the Maria Monastery. On the stool there was only the sushi he had eaten a few days ago. Compared with the original bright and beautiful memory, it was a dilapidated and abandoned monastery, and there would be no nuns drying sheets here. My sister must have died a long time ago. Is there such a person as a nun? The car accident seventeen years ago caused not only memory loss but also cognitive confusion. As long as the face twitches, it is impossible to distinguish reality. This is also a reminder. The intro and outro are in harmony with each other. At the beginning of the film, Kim looks at his shoes, the white sneakers that his daughter gave him at the end of the film, but they are worn backwards. 1 hour and 2 minutes, the conversation between the nun and Kim, the camera also showed the shoes, and put them upside down. I think Min Taizhou is a real murderer, not a multiple personality. As he said, they are all murderers, just look at them. And Kim is an excellent scapegoat for memory and cognitive problems. In the 19th minute, the movie shot was given to a small house in the forest, and then the sexy beauty was strangled to death. This murderer should be Min Taizhou, and the location is where the final battle will take place. Min likes to strangle people, and finally wants to kill Kim Byung Shou by strangling. On the night Jin was ready to kill Min, he started smoking again, and his memory disappeared for a week after that. When he checked his laptop after tying up Jin, Min said, "I almost had a big accident, but luckily I read your diary and replaced it with roe deer blood. That is to say, before that, he had seen Jin's notebook, and then transferred the evidence. This in turn proves that Min was indeed the one who killed the car that day. After that, Min killed Cao Yanzhu and set up a trap to put the blame on Jin. "The crime scene is nothing but Kim Byung Shou's fingerprints, arrest him", this trick is indeed very sinister. Some people said that there was only one corpse that was brought out in the end, so Jin imagined An Bingwan. The footage does only give one body, but it doesn't show that there is only one body at the scene. Same thing: Why the daughter of Jin's tape recorder, which is the evidence, only heard the part where he said he wanted to save her daughter when playing it? It cannot be inferred that the previous recording does not exist. Because the recording is in flashback, the recording to save the daughter is the last recording and the latest recording. The logic of playing this segment after pressing it is correct. If you look closely at the previous clips, Kim is in flashbacks when he confirms who Min is while listening to his own recording. And I looked at it carefully, and the corpse that I brought out should be Director An, because the shoes Min was wearing were black Nikes, and the inside of the corpse's shoes had white fringe. Regarding the Chief Prosecutor's question about why Jin wanted to kill Min, someone asked if the daughter could testify at this time? From the point of view of evidence, even if the daughter testified that Kim had committed the crime of killing Director An and intended to kill herself, it would not be strong evidence. Because of their father-daughter relationship, the relatives' testimony is not credible enough. In addition, the daughter was not necessarily willing to forgive her father for killing her mother before hearing this recording. Seeing her questioning her father at the scene of the crime was horrifying and hating. So, she may not necessarily defend her father, but after listening to the recording, I think she forgave her father because she went to the nursing home to take care of her father. After that, it should be possible to defend it, submit audio recording evidence, notebook evidence, etc. Only after this did gold appear on the train tracks. In the end, Jin saw Min's picture on the necklace given by his daughter, and I don't think it should be too much of a concern. As long as Jin's face twitches, it means that he has a disease and hallucinations appear in front of him, such as when he pinched his daughter before. At the beginning and end of the film, his face twitched violently, he twitched and took out the necklace. At the same time, the phantom also saw Min, indicating that he was in a state of confusion at this time. But since he was released, has it been proven that Kim is innocent and Min is a serial murderer? The following is my own little story, which has nothing to do with the movie, so I don't need to watch it. In the end, Jin saw Min's picture on the necklace given by his daughter, and I don't think it should be too much of a concern. As long as Jin's face twitches, it means that he has a disease and hallucinations appear in front of him, such as when he pinched his daughter before. At the beginning and end of the film, his face twitched violently, he twitched and took out the necklace. At the same time, the phantom also saw Min, indicating that he was in a state of confusion at this time. But since he was released, has it been proven that Kim is innocent and Min is a serial murderer? The following is my own little story, which has nothing to do with the movie, so I don't need to watch it. In the end, Jin saw Min's picture on the necklace given by his daughter, and I don't think it should be too much of a concern. As long as Jin's face twitches, it means that he has a disease and hallucinations appear in front of him, such as when he pinched his daughter before. At the beginning and end of the film, his face twitched violently, he twitched and took out the necklace. At the same time, the phantom also saw Min, indicating that he was in a state of confusion at this time. But since he was released, has it been proven that Kim is innocent and Min is a serial murderer? The following is my own little story, which has nothing to do with the movie, so I don't need to watch it.

I have a habit of recording dreams. I now have occasional confusion about the distant memories, because some of the dreams are too real. When I was five or six years old, one day should be Saturday, I dreamed that I got a very gorgeous treasure chest, which is the kind of treasure chest studded with diamonds and gold that often appears in the game. My brother snatched it away as soon as I got it. . I jumped out of bed and rushed over to beat my brother. My brother was doing his homework when he was suddenly beaten up by me. I was still crying and begging him to come back. My brother is very inexplicable: my brother is not a fool, right? Then my parents also questioned my brother if he took my things, and my brother naturally said no. I cried for a while and then slowly calmed down. My mother asked me if I was dreaming. I thought about it carefully: that thing really doesn't look like it might exist in reality. Had to admit it was a dream. The adults breathed a sigh of relief. Only my brother rubbed the shoulder I beat and looked at us with mixed feelings: Don't you want to say something to me? This is a memory that can be confirmed at the moment, no problem. The big problem is long-term memory. Probably in kindergarten or the first grade of elementary school, the children in my compound took me to an aunt's house one weekend in the fall. Her home is in a village outside our compound. The route is very complicated. It took seven or eight turns to find her home. That aunt's house is just like the forest hut in fairy tales: there is a thriving peach tree in front of the door, and the appearance of pink peach blossoms falling on the ground is very beautiful. Entering the wooden three-story hut, the furnishings in the house are very simple and elegant, the wall clock with wooden owls is ticking, and most of the furniture is made of solid wood. Auntie took us to play in the room on the second floor, there are many toys. For the first time in my life, I played a tumbler: Santa Claus with a red background and a white beard. There are also many pastries and treats. The 1980s was not an era of abundant food. It can be said to be very happy to eat so many pastries. Because I liked that tumbler so much, I went to my aunt's house to play for an afternoon by myself. We all later moved out of the compound. When I was in middle school, I told my former friend that I really wanted to visit that auntie's house again. My buddy said I don't even remember this happening. I said how could I forget, the three of us went together at that time, or the road you led. There is a peach tree in front of her house, an owl wall clock, and a tumbler... My little friends looked at me with dumbfounded expressions: Are you sleepy again? I said, then I'll take you to find it. So we went back to that village, it didn't look much changed, much smaller than I remembered, much older and less complicated. But I couldn't find the hut, nor the peach tree. The little friend patted me on the shoulder and said: Don't be a fool, you must be fantasizing again. There are no peach blossoms in autumn. But how could that tumbler be dreaming...