The whole movie is developed based on Professor Wolf's YY, and the people who do it don't know whether this old ghost is hallucinating or really has a keen intuition. The so-called suspense is also based on the unreal YY footage. After watching it for more than an hour, it suddenly ended. I don't know what happened. Is the murderer Professor Wolf, his student son, or just a passerby. Well, this open solution is too open.
This movie is not like the real adaptation of the Zodiac and Memories of Murder. There are no clues that exist objectively but are difficult to distinguish between true and false as suspense; the suspense of the whole film comes from the YY of the old wolf, why bother the audience so much!
Assuming that Professor Wolf did see the wolf son with the letter opener in the end, and there was no hallucination caused by taking drugs, then the wolf son should have indeed been to his house. Whether his son is the real murderer or not, at least he can be sure that the son deliberately wants to treat Laozi, then What is the purpose of the turtle son? In the end, this old ghost didn't do anything, so I taught my son a lesson, and the son didn't sue me. Is he bored? !
Let's assume that Professor Wolf was drinking too much alcohol and misread it. Then the letter opener at the end actually melted in the furnace. Could it be that the director was making an illusion again? !
If this old ghost is schizophrenic, he threw the knife into the stove and YY his son killed his lover (the son and the old man robbed the woman, wipe), then it can only be explained that Professor Wolf is evil, and hypnotizes himself to believe that the handsome guy is the murderer , a retired elite retired lawyer and professor and graduate tutor plus diamond Wang Laowu, is there such a fool!
If the ending of the movie is that this old ghost goes to prison, or that he is completely insane and put in a lunatic asylum, or that he commits suicide or something, then it is a bit of an explanation, indicating that the son is here to take revenge on Laozi, but the result of TMD is like this. It's over, it's over, it's over! ! ! ! ! !
What is this, Nima wastes more than an hour of Lao Tzu watching this old pervert YY.
In conclusion, I have to come up with a reasonable explanation. Personally, I still prefer the handsome guy to be the last man behind the scenes. I really can't think that it is a faceless passerby who committed the crime, otherwise I will vomit blood. Maybe the handsome guy killed the murders himself, or maybe he arranged for others to commit the crime, and then induced the old professor to introduce Nanni to him in order to achieve the purpose of exchanging keys. He deliberately let him see those photos and documents, induced him to write the script he made up, and maybe he also took some psychedelic drugs or sleeping pills in the wine, and the old ghost was hypnotized unknowingly (this is true a bit sloppy). In short, he was being led by the nose step by step, and of course the last scene was played for him to see, so the whole movie is still a suspense movie, but unfortunately these are just personal YY, because the most important thing is the ending! ! ! In the end, this ending was completely painless. Both the little wolf and the big wolf were safe and sound. I really don't know what to do with TMD.
View more about Thesis on a Homicide reviews
