So in the end, the murderer was still not caught. I knew it was him, but there was no evidence. It was a crime with high IQ! Nice shot, but slow pace
This is also called a suspense movie? The plot can be guessed in two steps by one step, but in the end it just stopped abruptly.
Two and a half stars, don't like open endings
Many people in the short comments complained that this suspense film was not up to standard, but I think it was very good.
It’s not because the plot is good that the filming is good, it’s because what the film wants to say and what I understand, and the point of the card is just right.
Our protagonist is not Sherlock Holmes, nor is he a high-ranking police officer, he is a lawyer, or a former lawyer who went to teach in an ivory tower after retreating.
A lawyer does not need to solve a case perfectly, a lawyer needs to defend the facts.
There is a basic spirit of the law here. Details can be spoken, and suspicion must never be found.
You have to respect the facts.
The case can be made into a movie, but the case is not a screenwriter.
The audience can have expectations, but lawyers, you are the Chancellor of Justice.
He wants to prove the murder of the second man all the time.
Butterfly, shopping receipt, the details strengthen his belief again and again, I am right
Because from the beginning to the end, what you want to do in your hands is to prove the conclusion in the right direction .
What to lose?
Lost a lawyer, should abide by the heart, but was abandoned by him to the spirit of the law.
View more about Thesis on a Homicide reviews
