I happened to see this film on the Internet recently, science fiction, plot, then come down and watch it. The film is an adaptation of a Swedish novel in the 1950s, the original won the Nobel Prize, and the background is on a spacecraft to Mars. The film has changed the characteristics of science fiction productions on the screen. The scene should be shot in a new commercial place, so the investment is much smaller than other films. In terms of character performances, the protagonists are all great, and there is no problem. Individual roles need to be adjusted. This will be mentioned immediately. Besides, the film's restoration of the novel, the novel that can win the Nobel Prize, there is no doubt that it must have a depth of excavation, and it is very deep. The two-hour film may not be able to reflect all the essence of the original work. Because reading novels, readers think while reading, watching movies, the audience passively follows the director's rhythm, which exposes a small flaw in the film (personally thinks ha), after the accident, it is the main content of this art work, the novel I haven't seen it, but what I can speculate is the changes and performance of human nature and the human heart when everything in the periphery loses aid and hope, but the film is relatively uniform and describes the first year, two years, five years, ten years, etc. separately. Due to the weight of time, the human nature and the depth of the heart are not deep enough, so it is recommended to have a primary and secondary description to dig the depth. The second point is that the nature and characteristics of the protagonist need to be contrasted. On this point, I personally feel that the description of the negative character of the captain and the astronomer is not enough. The above is my personal experience. The film and genre are very good, if there is a chance, it can be better.
View more about Aniara reviews
