The director insists that the story is the film director's pretext, so the idea is that most of his films are considered verbose because they are too long and lack plot, and I see it that way. Watching too many movies or the theory of film manuals is too strong, so that his films are only a kind of artistic exploration and games, and they are limited to the insiders' discussion, which completely loses the universality of the film, and can only be called in a sense. It's video art. The film uses repeated rhetoric to continuously strengthen the changes in the painter's inner world, express the changes of desire or inspiration, and place the depleted creative inspiration of the past tense represented by the wife and the renewed desire to create in the present tense represented by the model in the dark studio. , and constantly use the repetitive record-style painting process to deduce the climax of the occurrence and development of emotions and restraint to calm down. And then what did that painless permutation-type dialogue between characters at the end say? So I think it's too technical, so it lacks beauty and sublimation. Maybe I belong to the classical school.
View more about The Beautiful Troublemaker reviews
