Perhaps, if this film does not have the review of "Youth Handbook" and is not related to post-structuralism, then the film will be more submerged in the vast sea of shadows... Criticism of the film is the first time that the loss of structuralism has been radiated. Or deliberately concealed subjectivity, who is planning all this, yes, the movie comes at an election, this movie is obviously a superb partisan propaganda film, shot Lincoln, but obviously ignores more content, About him when he was a child, as well as leading the Civil War, running the country, parties, etc., have been hidden... Of course, the manual's criticism starts from Marxism and Freud theory, saying that it beautifies Lincoln's image and diverts politics. Become a moral, such as taking no money, and finally pushing it to the altar, so, what was originally a political party, turned into a perfect personality... And his constant sexual repression is obviously a bit far-fetched to analyze, but the interpretation of libido is originally Abstract, in short, he is asexual in the film, which is a more powerful illustration of his greatness, which is also the greatness of his party... The film explains his relationship with the family, it is a cycle, he Being benefited by this family, and then repaying this family, this kind of morality is also an ideological exaggeration... As the language of the film itself, Lincoln is tall, but in front of him, all the front and back shots, the other side is short, It can be said that this is a narrative language with the characteristics of a model drama movie... A movie, which leaves traces in the end, is not because of art, but has something to do with politics. This is also a very sad thing...
View more about Young Mr. Lincoln reviews
