First of all, the film has the characteristics of several American horror films - it is disgusting. Several protagonists in the film (the word is always awkward here) grabbed a monster and wanted to know his structure. Suddenly, the disgusting unknown liquid was shot everywhere, causing the A dwarf's grandma was corroded, and finally everyone put the grandma on the trebuchet as a human flesh bomb and went out! Of course, violent films naturally need to be violent. Many scenes are naked. I think people are afraid to face reality, so when violence is shown in front of people, they usually feel disgusting, explicit, and perverted. Since he's violent, that's how it should be, nothing more than a lot of violence is socialized and formalized in movies. The two words of violent aesthetics are contradictory in themselves, showing the bloody sensory stimulation, a real feeling, not so much the aesthetics of profiteering, but rather the real display of profiteering. Back to the scene in the movie, there is a scene where everyone took refuge on the roof, heard the baby's cry in the car downstairs, a man grabbed the rope and flew down, ran into the car and picked up the child (really handsome, of course he couldn't help but marvel at his Courage), the monster catches up, the man runs away with the child in his arms (the music is also good, slow but not tense), the director suddenly makes a big reversal of his personality, he throws the child into the air, the child is in the air Slowly descending, this is the camera returning to normal speed, the man ran away, and the child could not escape the original bad luck (maybe he could have escaped in the car). The human nature is fully revealed, and there is the irony of heroism. This is also the point of profiteering aesthetics! The end of the film is also very dramatic, and all cannot escape the doom. . . . . . . .
At the beginning of the movie, the interspersed black color is a bit like a natural born murderer!
View more about Feast II: Sloppy Seconds reviews
