Most people don't understand

This masterpiece is really unpopular. I didn't find it when I wanted to watch a comedy movie, and I couldn't find it when I watched a social reality movie about life at the bottom. I didn't find this movie until I found it in a bean column.

There are very few people who have watched it, and the short comments are less than 300. Judging from the current domestic cultural situation, there will be fewer people watching this film in the future. This excellent work will be like more classics. neglect and forgetting.

But from the current short reviews, there are many people who don't understand it at all, maybe laugh it as a comedy, or just drop a sentence. The vulgar joke, I want to target the latter point of view: the inferiority of the poor.

First of all, what does badness mean? It refers to the evil at the root. This evil has become a hotbed of crime. All kinds of domestic violence, swearing, incest, philistines, murder, rape, robbery, and prostitution all come from this.

The remarks on the inferiority of the poor are exactly the same as the once-popular theory of racial superiority. According to the principle of morality, the entire class is divided and the entire poor group is excluded from the root. Judging by the film alone, this argument doesn't hold up at all.

Because children are innocent, the director mercilessly divided the entire slum into two worlds, one for adults and one for children. The two worlds are diametrically opposed, separated from each other and absent from each other. When adults do evil, children never appear. When children play innocently, adults disappear again. What connects the two worlds is a thin girl wearing yellow rain boots. This little girl represents another group in the slum.

This group has not yet separated from the immaturity of children, but has reached the age of entering society, but the pure and kindness of children has taken root in her. A lotus flower blooms in the muddy pond, and the future is destined to be miserable. Yes, there are more or less hints in the film, such as prostitution and unintended pregnancy, she is just like Xiao Fuzi in Camel Xiangzi, who will die of fate.

So put away your shameless words about the inferiority of the poor. This is a film about the fate of the poor. It does not comment, explain, criticize or suggest. It only shows and presents, and exposes the lives of the poor. on the screen for reflection.

To put it another way, the chaos and madness presented in the film precisely reflects an essential condition of the slum, which is irregularity and disorder. The normal operation of society requires the restriction and maintenance of rules. One of the four aspects of morality, ethics, law and public is indispensable, and the four aspects of home, school, work, and public places are indispensable, but slums do not have any of them. This lack of possession brings disorder and irregular social conditions, which directly leads to the tragedy of the rampant rampant of the wicked and the fall of the good.

Who is to blame for the disorder? There are already a lot of hints in the movie. The modern city separated by a wall from the slums, the police judge who is indifferent to domestic violence, and the ubiquitous places of love without providing formal employment. The responsibility is self-evident.

Finally, there is something else I want to say, that is the dirty war in South America. When intellectuals with ideal aspirations really saw the root cause of poverty and wanted to solve the problem with the help of the masses, the upper mainstream society began to counterattack. Purges, many people have been arrested, tortured, assassinated, executed, etc., and the behind-the-scenes instigators of all this are the corrupt upper-class mainstream society, and the operators are all kinds of scum among the poor. Brighter.