Eh, forgive me that the film reviews of the first and second seasons are the same film, because I wrote it together~
A good work of art will arouse people's thinking, and even discuss the various plots and characters in the play. and insufficient. Instead of mindlessly, after watching all kinds of special effects or play, there is no more vulgar work that follows, and I don't even bother to post a short film review.
Daredevil tells the story of a blind man who stumbles upon his other senses enhanced and trained to become a superhero. Matt Murdock, because his father was killed by the underworld when he was a teenager, he chose to major in law and was a social vigilante who walked in the dark night.
His principle is very simple, to fight criminals as much as possible, but not to kill people, and to keep humanitarian thought deep in his heart. I want to use Daredevil to violently punish the bad guys that ordinary law can't take into account, but instead of killing them, I will notify the police to clean up the bad guys who have been sanctioned. He is also one of the superheroes I know so far, the one who really values human life the most in TV dramas, which even makes me feel a little too much. No matter how strong the opponent's belief in killing him, he was resolutely unwilling to put the opponent to death. Even in this definitely 18-ban film, it's rare to see him breaking the enemy's hand or leg, and it's more of a sprain. In contrast, I prefer the violence of "The Punisher", after all, it is simple and rude, and there is no need to go to the Catholic church every day to ask the priest if he is right.
After all, my knowledge is limited, and I don't know whether the person who committed the crime should pay for his life. I can't decide which one is more correct between Matt's approach and Frank's approach. I personally prefer Frank's approach. Today he killed an old lady and locked her up for a few years. If she behaved well, it might take a few months, or even not locked up in many cases (they would hire a lawyer to take advantage of it). Then next time, he may kill the child, maybe even your relatives. And he may even remain at large. And if we kill him to pay for his life, we can prevent our loved ones from being hurt.
Then, in recent decades, humanitarianism has been embraced around the world. Most countries have commuted death sentences of various kinds, most of them indefinitely. At the same time, the state has increased the welfare of prisons. You can eat three meals in prison that are dozens of times more delicious than in slums, you can have unimaginable accommodation conditions in slums, and even go to college in prison. Many times, even more comfortable than outside. If this is for those petty criminals who have committed thieves, maybe the common people don't care. But what would you think when one, several, a serious criminal who killed your relatives, violated your loved ones, eats well and sleeps well in jail, can study, and can even come out in a few years? Not everyone likes being Daredevil.
Even Daredevil, every time he made the decision not to kill, I could feel that he was struggling and tangled. Every time he made a decision, he made a great determination. Anyway, it's hard for me to understand. If he was on the battlefield, would he still choose this way? The problem was that the city he was in was already a battlefield. His choice reminds me of Desmond Doss in "Hacksaw. Ridge". At first glance, they both have the same principle, they both choose to die and not kill. But I think that Desmond is a rescue soldier. On the battlefield, his main task is to save people, not to kill the enemy. Of course, he can devote himself to saving people without touching firearms, because he has teammates who can kill the enemy, so he doesn't need to shoot himself. Don't carry the guilt of betraying your own principles by murdering yourself. Matt is different, he not only chooses not to kill, he always chooses to fight alone. He felt that his friends could not be involved, so he chose to hide from foggy for several years and chose to give up love.
I can understand about the romance with the nurse, after all she doesn't want to worry every day whether he will die at any time. But I think his relationship with foggy is weird. Even though Foggy already knew that he was Daredevil, he still chose not to tell him anything and wanted to save him. I can understand this, after all, the less you know, the safer you are. But it was difficult for me to understand, and I even wanted to call him an idiot, why he wouldn't even waste a minute, explaining in the few days of the trial, "The reason why I can't appear in court is because I'm investigating a group of people who might let The dynamics of the chaotic gang in New York, I have to figure out what they're planning. And that's why I can't help you sometimes, I know you're upset that I'm hiding something from you, but I hope you can trust me and Understand that I don't want you to be drawn into these dangers because I may not be able to protect you at all times. So I hope you will continue to support me and I assure you I will be more careful." A lot of times I think it's just a minute The things explained must be embarrassing in the film and television, and the plot seems to be very sloppy. And page and foggy, why page refused to tell foggy about frank, but let him help frank no matter how much foggy objected. I'm even more unhappy with this story than before matt and foggy, so much so that I skip all the related episodes because I know what they're going to say.
It's really hard for me to imagine that even if Page told Foggy about Frank, would Foggy not help Frank because of it? Wouldn't he be more eager to help him instead? Wasn't he determined to help people like frank? Even if Foggy knows the truth about Frank, will Foggy get in trouble? It's okay for page to be so stupid, what's wrong with foggy? I was literally speechless watching and even skipped the relevant episodes. I don't understand how the score at 8:00 came from. It's such a muddled plot, although it has the main line as a foil, but it's too much. It's just like the audience is a fool to drag it!
The plot has been dealing with matt's principles and fighting against the cruel reality. He won the first season. Forgive me for the second season. I haven't finished it yet, but I believe that at the end, to a certain extent, with the strength of his belief, he is also A must win. We respect those who respect their principles. Maybe his principles are not the same as most of us, but he sticks to his principles, even if the consequences are his own death, he is willing. This is what I see from this drama. Principles are very important, as Huang Zhizhong said, "The human soul is composed of various principles." If a person has no principle, he has no soul. So, respect yourself, start with respecting your own principles.
View more about Bang reviews
