At first glance, the movie is not bad, with the beautiful shell of a road movie. (1. They keep running, running, running. 2. The beautiful scenery along the way. 3. The soundtrack is quite good, very in line with the rhythm and rhythm that a road film should have.)
The director succeeded in making the audience feel that the two The various criminal activities that the protagonist undertakes along the way are fun and cool! Why would the audience like it? First, I admit that the director does have certain directing skills. Second, everyone may have the so-called "evil" nature in their hearts, and they want to do something that violates the established norms of society (including laws). Third: as the audience, we subjectively believe that they are the products of a specific era - "hippies", so all their evil behaviors can be forgiven.
So let's talk about "hippies". If the many definitions of "hippie" include "a group of people who pursue complete individual liberation" and "a group of people who pursue the equality of human rights", (I believe no one will object). So shouldn't women be liberated in the eyes of "hippies"? Don't women deserve the same human rights as men? The answer is of course no. So can the behavior of the two male protagonists insulting women along the way be called what a "hippie" should do? The answer is of course no.
So, my conclusion is that the two male protagonists are "pseudo-hippies". The film itself is also a low-quality "commercial film" wrapped in an art film coat.
View more about Going Places reviews
