I watched this movie with anticipation last night and was a little disappointed.
The director wanted to emphasize artistry too much. From the corpse that was hanged upside down and dyed blue, to the last detective partner who was cruelly turned into an ink bottle by the killer, on the one hand, it expressed the artistic technique of perspective in the Renaissance, on the other hand, it expressed the so-called so-called perspective. : Look at the world from a different perspective. However, the director did not explain why the killer used such extreme methods, nor did he explain the killer's motive for killing. It feels inexplicable that all kinds of strangely shaped corpses appear. The visual impact is enough, but the content is seriously insufficient and does not conform to conventional logic.
In addition, the killer should be a crime with high IQ, he said in the phone call to the detective: the detective is sitting in his favorite chair, facing his own shadow or a girl dying. This sets the stage for the detective's final death. But why would the killer kill the detective? The killer used all kinds of artistic expressions before, which can be said to be the pinnacle. Why did he solve the detective with one shot? It doesn't feel like the killer's usual murderous style.
In the end, I personally feel that this killer is a person with high IQ and EQ, not to mention the IQ. It can be seen from the strange appearance of the deceased that the high EQ is reflected in the killer's successful persuasion of the girl, and in the girl tattooed on her body and eventually killed her. This shows that the killer's communication skills are very strong, and his emotional intelligence will not be low. Personally, people with high EQ and IQ should not leave clues in the paintings, at least not such direct clues, so that detectives can find him.
The overall feeling of this film is illogical and anticlimactic.
View more about Anamorph reviews
