This season of Flash is about to end. In episode 23, Barry returns to 15 years ago, but the future Barry knows this and motions to Barry not to save his mother. Here is the question of time refutation. The favorite in the Flash series is this concept. Assuming that the normal timeline is that Barry grows up to the future normally, Reverse Lightning discovers Barry’s real name and goes back to the past to kill the child Barry, but the Flash goes back to the past and saves the child Barry, but he did not expect Reverse Lightning to kill Barry’s mother. Then the child Barry survived, and the Flash could continue to exist in the future, but the Reverse Lightning lost its power and could not return to the future. On the contrary, it had to promote the growth of the Flash (Prophet's retort), which has formed a loop in the key point hut. After growing up, Barry has the ability to return to 15 years later, if he saves his mother, Reverse Lightning will also return to the future, which will result in resetting circuit 1. Basically, it can be understood that Barry is the third circuit in the play. He saw the future of the secondary circuit and Barry gave a reminder. He did not save his mother and ended the circuit. Barry was too miserable, watching his mother die and could do nothing. There may still be the problem of (fateful rebuttal). Going back to the past has become an established fact in the past. On the contrary, the outcome that came out of doing so cannot be changed at all. In the end, the detective committed suicide and erased the existence of the inverse lightning in the future (the grandfather's rebuttal) was absorbed by the wormhole. I guess it was sucked into the future, was rescued and then gave birth to inverse lightning, the story continues?
View more about The Flash reviews
