In addition to the long shots, maybe there are some reasons for scoring in terms of scripts?

Jesus 2022-01-19 08:02:04

The following content contains a lot of spoilers ! !

1. The author of this article believes that many reviewers did not understand the film correctly, so he made this article.

2. Sorting out the many unexplainable scenes and scenes of the film, combining various comments on the Internet, and deriving what I think is the plot trend of the film.

3. There are a lot of inappropriate translations of subtitles. This article is translated correctly based on the author's ears.

4. This article is a personal understanding, readers are invited to judge the credibility of the article.

5. After watching the video at least once, read this article in conjunction with the video.

The following is a fragment that cannot be explained at all during normal viewing (marked A):

1. There are three unexplainable jitters in this film, like an earthquake, the objects are shaking. One minute before the beginning of the film, the table next to the protagonist’s wife; 1 hour and 37 minutes, the nurse’s lounge, and the police lounge.

2. In 1 hour 28 minutes, the protagonist did not pick up the clothes in the laundry, and the clerk said, "Could it be your wife who took it." The protagonist replied, "Impossible."

3. In 35 minutes the protagonist’s wife got lost, went to the hospital with the protagonist’s wife in 37 minutes, and claimed that he did not remember the "Blue Beard" that he had watched at the beginning of the film.

4. At 1 hour 46 minutes, the protagonist listened to an incomprehensible recording.

5. At 1 hour and 47 minutes, the nurse left the abandoned house. The last shot was of a female body with an X on her neck.

6. Starting at the same hour and 47 minutes and ending at the end of the film, the waiter lifted the knife after finishing packing.

7. For 1 hour and 26 minutes, the protagonist looked at his sleeping wife and went to the kitchen to take a knife. And the scene of the bus that was immediately switched to. The protagonist and his wife are sitting in the last row of the vintage bus. There are clouds and fog outside the window, talking about travel. The protagonist denies the travel (the next scene is to take his wife to the hospital). And, the protagonist is alone in the back of the bus for 1 hour and 40 minutes.

The following is a fragment that can be understood during normal viewing, but there are doubts (marked B):

1. 1 hour and 30 minutes, a short film taken in the 19th century found by Sakuma; 1 hour and 33 minutes, a book found by Sakuma, a portrait photo on him, and "someone" in the wooden house. Look at each other (I really don't see who this person is).

2. For 1 hour and 42 minutes, the protagonist went to the wooden house and checked a portrait photo that was the same as the one found by Sakuma.

3. For 1 hour and 43 minutes, the protagonist and Mamiya met in the wooden house. Mamiya said, "Why let me go?", "Let me go, you can know my secret alone", the protagonist shoots him, and then "I remember it." Is it?", Mamiya nodded.

4. The protagonist turns off the drum washing machine at home three times: At 16 minutes, the protagonist goes home for the first time and turns off the drum washing machine. The camera shows that there is nothing in the washing machine, and then the wife turns it on again. Today’s dinner is heated by the protagonist; 1 hour When the protagonist went home and turned off the washing machine, he found that his wife was not at home, and went out to look for it; 1 hour and 25 minutes, the protagonist went home and turned off the washing machine. The wife turned it on again, and the protagonist fell the raw beef in the bowl.

5. For 1 hour and 2 minutes, the protagonist asks to seize the items of Mamiya, finds the scar, and then finds the residence of Mamiya.

6. For 1 hour and 12 minutes, the protagonist found Mamiya, "You can't escape.", and Mamiya responded, "You want to escape.", the protagonist said "I know your trick", Mamiya returned "Yes" Want to find an answer, just come to me?". Then, under forced questioning, the protagonist confided to Mamiya that his wife did not understand him, and said, "Why are people like you so relaxed, but I suffer?", "I want to take care of such a wife for the rest of my life.", " Without you, my wife and I would be fine", "I'm done, but I can't forgive you"

7. For 1 hour and 13 minutes, Mamiya turned on the lighter and was immediately photographed by the protagonist. After 1 hour and 16 minutes, the protagonist said, "Can't you tell me if there is no light?", turn on the lighter and put it to the side without looking directly. The lighter was extinguished by the water seeping through the roof. The protagonist looked at the water droplets and Mamiya said, "This water can free you and liberate your body and mind, just like me." That colleague.

8. At 59 minutes, Mamiya asked to smoke, the protagonist grabbed the cigarette and refused.

9. For 1 hour and 23 minutes, Mamiya said to the protagonist, "Hearing my voice, it means you are a special person", "You knew it from the beginning, and I knew it", "You are a person who can read me" After that, the protagonist beat Mamiya.

At 10, 33 minutes, the protagonist guesses that the murderer is the possibility of a hypnotist, and hypnotizes with light.

At 11 or 11 minutes, Mamiya asked the wife-killer, "It's noisy, what's the sound?", Mamiya said, "It's too quiet."

Combine the judgments below to start reasoning.

The premise, the logic part of the script:

1. The first question is how to understand hypnosis.

The people who are hypnotized and commit homicide in the film have a common feature, that is, "amnesia". There are not enough shots of prostitutes. The murderer did not explain the reason, nor did he mention Mamiya. The one who killed the colleague refused to name Mamiya. (After the protagonist received a report from his colleague on the clues, he found Mamiya)

2. People with amnesia in this film (except those who are hypnotized by Mamiya).

The most serious is Mamiya, followed by his wife. Again, the protagonist himself. Needless to say, Mamiya, please see A3 for the wife's reasons. The protagonist himself sees A2.

3. Mamiya and the protagonist

B5, the protagonist exceeded his authority and asked to seize the items of Mamiya, who was still a witness at the time, and found a scar to lead out his murderer. B6, Mamiya tries to communicate with the protagonist's heart (like other people who are hypnotized by Mamiya), but fails.

4. The truth about the protagonist

B10, the protagonist was hypnotized earlier than the psychologist guessed. B1+B2, indicating that the protagonist is related to this book, that is, the protagonist is related to hypnosis. B7+B8, the protagonist deliberately avoids or blocks the hypnotic technique of Mamiya, indicating that the protagonist understands his hypnotic mechanism. B9, Mamiya implied that the protagonist responded with violence, rather than expressing incomprehension (this answer is almost equal to default).

Combining 3 and 4, the protagonist understands hypnosis and understands the person Mamiya, leading the police to arrest Mamiya (B10, B5).

5. Let go of Mamiya

The protagonist let Mamiya go out of the name of making Mamiya the last homicide, as explained below. The method of releasing Mamiya is not shown in the film, which is explained below. Mamiya didn’t know why he was let go in B3, and the protagonist responded "Remember it?"

6. The protagonist and his wife

A2, B4, and B6 show that the wife is a wife who doesn’t know how to do housework, doesn’t go to the laundry to get clothes, and doesn’t go to work. . (No wonder the protagonist gets bored)

In B6, the protagonist confides to Mamiya about his annoyance with his wife. In B4, it illustrates the contradiction between the protagonist and his wife, showing affection on the surface, but tirelessly behind the back. A7, taking a knife implies that the protagonist wants to kill his wife.

7. Waiter

The waiter in A6 seems to be hypnotized. She has no value in the whole composition of the story, but she needs to prove one thing in the story.

The premise, the art processing part of the film:

Here is the author’s understanding of the cult part of the film

1. A7, how to understand the bus. The first time the bus is understood as the protagonist rejects his wife's request and wants to kill the wife at the same time, the second time the bus only has the protagonist, and it is understood that he "abandoned" his wife.

2. A1, no one responds to the shock in the film. According to the Japanese knowledge of earthquake prevention, if there is an earthquake, they will definitely respond immediately. No one is surprised by the three scenes in the film three times. Here, the author of this article thinks it is a hint of a cult technique. After being hypnotized, the character uses the vibration of the table and the objects on the table as a hint.

①, A1+A3, my wife was hypnotized, and I don't remember that I have watched "Blue Beard".

②, A1, the police lounge, the police desk shakes, the policeman was hypnotized and released Mamiya. Note that at this time the protagonist is in Sakuma's house and immediately rushes to Mamiya's room, but Mamiya has already escaped. The protagonist has an alibi.

③, A1, the nurse's lounge, the nurse killed a woman in A5 and drew the X wound. The victim is inferred to be the protagonist’s wife.

in conclusion:

What caused my wife and Mamiya’s amnesia? There seems to be an echo between B4 and B11, they are both interested in a noise without a specific tone.

His wife, Mamiya, police colleague, Sakuma, nurse, and waiter are hypnotized by the protagonist. Among them, the police colleague and Sakuma have had contact with Mamiya, but the frequency and degree are far not as deep as the protagonist. Of course, it can be understood that the protagonist successfully avoided, but neither of them. but! It is impossible for the wife to have contact with Mamiya from the film or from the logic of the story. The other two extremely important roles, nurses and waiters, are also unlikely to have had contact with Mamiya, especially the waiter (A6). If this role is not meant to prove the protagonist’s hypnotic ability, it is worthless in the script. !

In other words, the protagonist has only one purpose, which is to kill his wife , and the others in the film are the protagonist's tools.

Sakuma found an ancient film and an important book. The protagonist inferred that he might find the truth, was hypnotized and killed, and blamed Mamiya with X.

The nurse kills his wife, is blamed on Mamiya, and kills with the X technique.

The police let Mamiya go, and the protagonist has an alibi at this time.

After the death of Mamiya, the waiter still behaved abnormally, inferred to be the protagonist.

And Mamiya is the main tool of the protagonist. He is hypnotized by the protagonist, and the three of them are hypnotized successively to form a serial killing mode (neck X). In the end, the nurse kills his wife's neck X, and the nurse is hypnotized by the protagonist. At this time, the protagonist hypnotizes his colleague and releases Mamiya in order to give Mamiya a place where he can commit crimes, so as to put the blame on Mamiya. At the same time, when Mamiya escapes, the protagonist has an alibi.

That is, the protagonist hypnotizes Mamiya, and Mamiya hypnotizes the three people to form a serial murder. The protagonist then hypnotizes the nurse and asks the nurse to kill his wife, and at the same time put the blame on Mamiya.

Finally, the author of this article believes that in the final A4, Mamiya will hypnotize himself and forget his behavior. (This is not easy to convince people, but such an explanation, or even not explaining, or using other methods to explain, will not hurt the entire logical chain)

In the last shot of the film, the protagonist smokes and drinks coffee in the restaurant, as if everything is relieved, which also explains all this.

Zhenger Bajing ends with the full text of the video:

Samsung, because of the problem of viewing experience. Cult always doesn't make people feel so bright, and always asks the audience to analyze it in depth, and be a little arrogant. I also don't know enough about photography to understand every use of long shots and the director's meticulous arrangement. But taking time is a good film, but in 8012, who would spend so much time on a movie? Besides, most people can't find out, or are not interested in finding out.

As a suspense film, the biggest suspense lies in this film. After the audience watched the film, they asked themselves questions. If you feel that the whole story is simple, you still have to pick up the script and read it several times. I have to say that the American TV series "True Detective" has a lot in common with this film. I like long shots and the tone is brownish brown. I like to say only half of my lines, which is like a detective film. The difference is that the director of this film seems to have a special purpose in it, that is, to let the audience participate in the case, and I don't know how many audiences can enjoy this detective process.

View more about Cure reviews

Related Articles