Not good looking
The first is the post-dubbing, which is very abrupt at first
Every little story has nothing to do with it, but it is reluctant to explain the plot, so that people can barely understand it.
There are not many exposed under the banner of eroticism and they are all ugly
The shooting is also very amateur, I always only shoot at the face
The actor's acting skills are worrying, and the photo shooting is very embarrassing...
I have seen the original work, and the stories of the Big Tank in the Nightingale Nunnery are somewhat impressed, but the filming is far from the feeling of brain replenishment at the time. There is a feeling of dreams shattered... Some stories are not remembered, but they do not affect viewing
The painter's incident was probably added by the director, but the meaning is unclear.
Most importantly, the core human liberation in the original "Decameron" is not reflected in the movie too much, which is regrettable.
Put two stars together, add one star to the idea of making the original work into a movie, three stars
Finally, the question is, did people not brush their teeth in 1971? It seems that no actor has good teeth. Are the strangely shaped pants restored from the original Decameron? Those pants are really refreshing. Is there really no funding? The actress is so ugly...
View more about The Decameron reviews
