2. In such a cruel war environment, one of the soldiers was pierced by the neck, and his group was covered by artillery fire. Then, in order to escape danger, aerial bombing support was requested. The prosecutor said that the bombing support killed 11 civilians, including bombing. After the photo of the deceased. There is a question to ask the prosecutor. First of all, the enemy’s artillery attack has basically suppressed our side. If air support is not required, the result will be that our side will basically be annihilated, but the enemy will not attack after attacking the 6th area. After a little bit, there are indeed enemies in the No. 6 area and they are there. Secondly, after taking pictures of the deceased, only a few pictures of the children were taken, but none of the enemy’s pictures were taken? Even if the Taliban had transported all their corpses, would there be no traces of blood left? Or there is no trace at all? Obviously, I was looking for a scapegoat for this incident! Once again, the No. 6 area just analyzed that there was an enemy, and later there were civilians in the photos. Well, the civilians were basically hijacked, and their own side was suppressed and covered by artillery fire. They can’t go out anymore. They don’t ask for support anymore. Hang up all, here, I want to ask, what should you do with the prosecutors in this situation?
View more about A War reviews
