Owl said that he teaches evolutionary psychology and is a writer at the same time. He wrote books about human beings looking for meaning and where they came from.
The chicken said, it doesn't sound like a brainy content. It's better to write a book about cheese, while pinching my foot, I saw it for the second time and found that there was a toe-like proliferation on the heel.
Who is supporting this paragraph?
First of all, evolutionary psychology is not the theory of evolution. What I understand is that some of the current mental states of human beings are related to primitive people in the barbaric era. For example, we can speculate on the transition from matrilineal clan to patrilineal clan from our views on marriage.
According to my understanding, it does not oppose creation or evolution. First, the psychological explanation can be to shoot the arrow first and then draw the target (you can see that I am in black psychology), and secondly, it is okay for humans to leave the mark after a few years of barbarism in the Ark. Therefore, as the most normal person inside, the owl is neutral.
And the chicken argument is the ordinary people's argument, don't talk about those useless, save the money for studying the Higgs particles and building churches for me to eat and wear. So this place is neutral.
From the first paragraph, you should be able to easily see that I am not pretending to understand. Welcome to point out mistakes.
Owl originally thought that these people were uneducated, but the audience discovered that these people read stories before going to bed, they all read science. Is there any better bedtime reading?
Instead, the owl gave out the Bible to everyone. The chicken said that the old man would not let the Bible read only science. The owl said that he must read the Bible, and the mouse said that I want to understand the content of the Bible for the sake of science.
Rats are neutral, chickens support science, and owls are fairly neutral.
"The schizophrenic sacrificed his son Isaac, and reined in blahblah because of the angel's arrival." The mouse gushed in analysis.
"Could you just read and don't explain." Owl said.
When the mouse finished speaking, the owl asked again: "Then can you tell us what this story tells us?"
But I couldn't come back when I interrupted, as if nothing made sense.
It’s hard to justify the story of the Bible if you want to explain it seriously. It’s hard to figure out the source of the Jesus in the virgin’s belly. It’s probably like a gift from an online download event. Anyway, the old king next door is mostly in the trinity with his son, and I am ignorant. I heard that which sect respects that cheap old man with a green hat. So "don't explain" but "accept the teachings" is a beneficial expression for Christianity; but in turn, this is also something that should be learned from the Bible from a scientific point of view.
In the early days of mankind, the civilization was maintained by religion, so religion has its effect after all. For ancestors, the reason for not stealing or looting or killing is because they will be punished by God.
This place seems to be neutral again, and it seems that the Black Bible cannot justify itself.
It's also strange that the patterns on the plate in my impression include chickens, cows, dogs, and owls. It seems to be the one used by the older brother. Why is a fat man a mouse? I always thought it was a pig, but it turned out to be a mouse because of cheese? Are you getting fat because you don’t have enough activity to find food?
Then I wonder, why do you say that the brothers are holding a bad hand given by nature? Obviously it was the old man who played a worse combo with a bad card. You are a pastor, dad, you can be so dirty.
And let me wonder, why is the title called Man and Chicken? Is it just for the feat of pulling the uncle, and taking a photo with the warmth of the man and the chicken at the end? I'm so superficial!
Finally I found the black spot!
The old man cannot bear children. It can be said that he was abandoned by God and was not favored. In the end, he relied on science to take a heinous road and became his own child inhumanely.
This is black science, right?
Look at what you scientists are doing, going against the sky (sounds so handsome!), doing such a vicious thing. Follow the science, and sooner or later you will be neither human nor dog.
If you feel that I am delusional about being victimized for a scientist, you can think about the plot. If it is "the old father who believes in religion but can only give birth to a deformed stillbirth, and finally relied on the science students to give birth to a human-shaped son, it is gratifying to congratulate" then it is a black religion. If you still think that this plot can only be performed like this, after all, "how can it be deformed because of religion" and "only science can do such a cruel thing", then would it be that you are not neutral?
Forget it, I can't make it up.
The struggle between Christianity and the theory of evolution has a long history. I heard that foreign countries are a little sensitive to discussions in this area. Therefore, movies, dramas, books, etc. involve the dispute between the two, and there will always be preferences and even extremes.
So under malicious speculation, if I don’t want to explicitly support one party, but want to make something new, what should I do as a director?
I could pound the table to muddy chicken soup: "what you noisy noisy life so great, humanity continues to pursue and advance as far as we cherish great hopes to continue to explore the truth of it we have been touched by yourself is not good!!!"
The So four stars, one star was really given to Uncle Ba, and the figure that he hid from behind the cow and walked over, he couldn't forget it after seeing it once. In addition, Samsung gave it good-looking, smooth and almost no urine points, as well as several familiar faces of "Adam's Apple".
View more about Men & Chicken reviews
