Recently I made a bunch of movies about this theme, that is, a woman who is about to enter marriage or is already married, after encountering a gay or bisexual girl, Sanguan collapses and breaks with her boyfriend’s family, suddenly discovering that true love is driven by desire and love Under the apostasy. They can have relationships with their boyfriends and husbands. They often tell men I love you after being attracted. They were planning to get married or lingering with men one second before they rolled over with the girl on the bed the next second. Think of them as bisexuals for the time being, and these women, what are they doing? What's going on?
Family ethics demand too much of women. Many people under the British Patient Films item commented that it is unethical. A derailed woman, a woman who pursues her own desires will always make people shocked to a certain extent. If she is a good wife and a good mother, and a good woman who is docile, then this crusade and moral judgment will be more fierce. . Therefore, those bisexuals who can accept men and love women, entering the family and ethical level are simply rebellious and acting nonsense, not to mention that they often have children. This is a complicated question.
In the ordinary mind, gay men face the male protagonist’s proposal of restrained sexual behavior. This is how we can finally break through the morality and the pressure of our group to indulge our body. This is the basis of our existence, that is, the rationalization of desires, which is not legal. Look at so many deep cabinets who can't accept themselves, those who self-mutilate and commit suicide and are tortured to death by themselves. Therefore, being able to accept one's own orientation and desires is the most essential and fundamental proof of the existence of this group. Going back to bisexuality, selective subject matter shows its value choice in this respect. That is to say, the desire of women shows that they are not a group of labels that only cook, do housework, take children to shop, and compete with each other. The golden hair, breasts, thighs and thighs can grow. They have self-knowledge and control, and this control often forms a great tension with self-knowledge. So when they lose control, something must break through the fortresses of control and on top of it, and this must fall on desire. It can be sexual desire, the pursuit of work and career, and the realization of social self-worth. Obviously, the film still stays at the first level. Even the first level must master the scale. It requires a beautiful face, a beautiful body, a romantic story, and a part of harsh moral evaluation. But it is the most fundamental and the basis of legalization.
It is the safest way to trust nature when you can't think of a better way. Whether homosexuality is born or acquired is always being discussed and discussed. But it is a paradox in itself and cannot be proven, but legalization requires such a conclusion. It allows people to return to the most primitive level, the level of animals, to find proof of their own existence. On the contrary, it is clear where the degree of freedom of choice given to people by the operating mechanism of society is stuck at a glance.
Why do you need a family? Only a monogamous couple can be considered a family, and the spouse must be named husband and wife. If you are in China, you can make such a consideration. The operation of the territory and bureaucracy must rely on the power of the clan to nail people into the family, the family is set in the clan, and ethics and morality are used outside the law to let everyone perform their own duties, nurture the next generation and provide for the elderly. Is it the most suitable for such economical and effortless social operations outside of administration to be mixed with traditional rural ideas on this vast territory? And how can these groups that shout that I can choose freely can not make people headache, why are they not heretics. Putting aside the theory of innateness, the free choice of acquired nature is even more rebellious. This is why the homosexual group and the female group regard desire and instinct as a breakthrough point. The yardstick of free choice is legal only in an instinctive sense. In absolute terms, free choice does not exist or its scope is very small, especially legal.
Back to those girls, what do they want to do. They want to follow their own desires, which is their nature. I have known a person for seven years, ten years, twenty years and even have children. Knowing a woman for a day without living with her is sure that this is true love. I want to spend the rest of my life with her. This is simply a fantasy. We are back to the origin of the problem of pulling away. An object of desire makes a woman break with the family completely because she wants to enter the relationship with the woman. What will be the consequences? Will she continue to pursue the path of self-knowledge to realize her own value and promote a value choice that conforms to nature and desire? Yes, choice is value. She already possesses this kind of value. Will this make the society extremely scared to think about it, make a bureaucratic group that needs to pin men and women within their respective identities to prevent it from becoming obsolete, and will it panic the people who fear that their social resources will be taken away?
And those women who can accept having relationships with men, what if they are not bisexual. If they are gay. This is not great, but it is politically necessary, which reflects the depth and intensity of the value selection that the film can achieve in the choice of themes. However, this goal is still something after feelings and desires. It is the most superficial surface. It is a label that can be added to by groups and organizations. What we return to is still human nature, emotions, needs, and the dignity of women. And satisfaction, the manifestation of the value of a woman. But this therefore contains the strength of social criticism and the choice of value and political demands. This question should not be avoided.
Return to the world, from an ideal state. There is nothing to choose from a woman. In this land, women are still tied up in the family for survival and production. She must get married and have children, and fulfill her obligations in her own identity. She was even stigmatized as a leftover girl when she chose to be single, as if she was forced rather than actively choose. And this active choice is where a person's dignity and freedom are realized.
However, some people say why choosing heterosexual marriage is not free, choosing heterosexuality is not free, choosing to have children is not free, choosing to stay in the mountains and forgive everyone is not freedom... This is freedom, it is a kind of choice. And I am more concerned about whether there is a wider choice space and options. I am more concerned about why the option appears but it is the same as it does not appear. Even if it is selected, it will be regarded as abnormal and will undergo mental and physical stress. Physical torture. I think this is also the favorite place of literary movies. Only in the choice can there be a burst of power. Just like Oliver.
Finally, how long will it take for the movie to become a reality? In terms of time, I don’t know how long it has taken for the first gay movie to legalize the same sex in the first country. But I know that no Chinese movie of this type has been launched in theaters so far. Few people show lesbian and bisexual themes.
Lu Man, hope to live.
View more about Kiss Me reviews
