When I just heard the name "Blood of the Machine", I thought it was cool and fashionable, in line with the usual feeling of science fiction films, but I also felt strange in my heart, but I couldn't say why. Last night, I saw it in the theater. Are you sure it's a science fiction movie? Not an action movie, a shootout, or a comedy, a drama? I can't tell the difference so stupidly. Compared with the "weird" before watching the movie, after watching the movie, I feel more "Christmas", grotesque, um, yes.
It stands to reason that the 63-year-old Uncle Long can still have three or four movies to meet with the audience a year. It is not easy to be so productive. Seeking truth from facts, aside from the actors and acting skills, this film is purely a bad film in the true sense, with a perfect score of 10, a maximum of 5 points, and a failure.
Biochemical humans, robotic hearts, genetic mutations, regenerative functions... These are all routines, all old stalks, nothing new, and not too creative. These sci-fi elements introduced do not highlight the theme of sci-fi, but only symbolize the movie. , but I have to brush the ball, try to theme, try to make soft sci-fi into hard sci-fi, but it is actually an action movie. I feel that sci-fi has become a gimmick of the movie. I think, remove the sci-fi, this movie still holds true.
It even happens that when the film logically connects these familiar sci-fi elements, there are many inconsistencies and abrupt situations. The super self-healing ability actually only chooses good people and not bad people? There are bugs in both versions 1.0 and 2.0 of Blood of the Machine. Will there be versions 3.0 and 4.0 for "Machine 2"? Are there differences in the fusion between the various versions? With blood and family, a little blood can regenerate, but strangers must be 100% and there will be reflux phenomenon? ...Perhaps, technology (or science fiction) has a long way to go to promote the all-round development of human beings, even immortality and immortality...
However, no matter what, we must believe in the power of technology and the power of productivity. What we want to see is: technology bugs are constantly corrected and self-healing, versions are constantly upgraded, and the science fiction "God Man" Asimov proposed to protect human beings and comply with The goal of ordering and preserving their own advanced intelligence and human thinking "super soldier", and realizing the harmonious coexistence of technology and human beings.
The grotesque plot, grotesque sci-fi, and grotesque ending seem to be in line with the fast-paced, large-scale production characteristics of commercial blockbusters, as well as the purpose of single-line and appetizing, but the film itself is messy and nondescript, which brings entertainment business to people. Visual impact, but it is difficult to arouse the inner resonance of professional professionals.
It is difficult for film critics to be rational and multi-linear. Tucao welcome, I will reply in time, thank you.
View more about Bleeding Steel reviews