Announcer

Madelyn 2022-11-04 08:16:46

I went to see the one-star reviews of "In This Corner of the World". They are roughly divided into several categories. I will list them one by one and make corresponding comments. The first category is Japanese as long as it makes no sense. Watching straight 1 star this kind of idiots is not in my comment scope skip the second category and make them disgusting like victims this category is better than the above but the movie is really worth watching Most of them have at least seen the trailer or not The protagonists of this movie are basically a group of ordinary people. If the protagonists are a group of soldiers, they would dare to be so miserable. I'm sorry I don't need you to tell me. Or that sentence, no matter which country suffers in the war, it is the common people who are sold miserably? I'm sorry, but it's miserable. The third type thinks the movie is good, but I can't solve the hatred and accept it Reasons to hate them but if you just want to follow the wind please don't look for presence here The fourth category is also a very large category They think this is a Japanese anti-defeat movie not an anti-war movie for this type of people I have an understanding attitude for the time being, but the movie is still in vain. Most people's controversy is that the female protagonist's words broke out after the Yuyin broadcast, which made many people misunderstand that this is an anti-defeat movie. Of course, this has nothing to do with this movie. Most people don’t understand the movie in China, and the most important point is that basically all Chinese have never read the original book. Facing history is not remembering hatred

View more about In This Corner of the World reviews

Extended Reading
  • Zola 2022-04-17 09:01:13

    Japan is anti-war, using the atomic bomb to package itself as a victim of the war, but isn't this war provoked by the Japanese? I can't see the reflection on the war, I will only use the description of the families of the bottom people to sensationalize

  • Cheyenne 2022-04-17 08:01:01

    It is easy to forget the national character of "harming": the way Germany treated the war after the war was admirable. They openly admitted their harm, but unfortunately Japan did not take corresponding measures. This is because the awareness of victims is very strong, both at the national level and at the national level. This is the case at the individual level of the nation, and Japanese history has naturally adopted such an attitude. Did you forget the memory of the perpetrator? Or do you put your heart into it, thinking that everyone is doing this and writing off everything? Anyway, all the people turned to the direction of forgetting - it was Hirokazu Koreeda's "Things I Was Thinking When I Made a Movie". I'm not a statist or a nationalist, but I just think that the phrase "Japan has never had any real anti-war works" is not a big deal if you weigh it carefully. I have been in Japan for more than ten years, and I have been in daily contact with Japanese people at all levels. I have never seen anyone who has a clear attitude towards the massacre and aggression in their country during World War II. They always tend to detour themselves in their words and excuse themselves: the nature of war is like this; we are also victims. It's all the government's fault. As if it were an unsolved mystery.