Under the recommendation of the poisonous sir, I finally watched this prestigious but controversial movie.
All I can say is that after the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the protagonist cooperated with the poignant BGM to say the lines shown in the picture. How many times I watched it was also an anti-war defeat movie in an anti-war cloak.
Art can know no borders, but history cannot
As an aggressor, the war was never separated from the people, so why should history be asked to discuss the Japanese army and the Japanese people separately?
If the director only pursues "local political correctness", he should not use the banner of "anti-war". The "anti-war" movie is really not bad for yours. After the film is made, if you say it, you deserve the scolding from the international community. Bear it, it's time to cancel the poisonous sir public account
Don’t argue, it means you are right, and it means I don’t have an international vision, or the same sentence, art can have no borders, history can’t, and the national complex should be considered when creating this movie. The reason for this is that the creator did not consider it well.
View more about In This Corner of the World reviews
