1. The amount of information is small, the main body and details of multiple stories are not full enough, the incident is not enough impact, and the story is mediocre. In this way, a story that is not full can actually be told in less time.
2. The stories are of poor quality and can't impress me deeply, and won't make me fall in love with these stories. Such a mediocre story has no value in telling.
3. The author has poor storytelling ability, procrastination, not fast enough, and immature narrative skills. The simplified dialogue and plot are not simplified. The choice of connecting points for the cut and collage is not good, so I don't remember it deeply.
4. The character is not clear, pretending to have a clear feeling. The settings of many characters can still be simply summarized as cliché attributes: mouthless, cute loli, black belly, Zhengtai, etc. It is no different from the characters in other works. The setting of the dumb couple appeared on several pages in Naoki Urasawa's manga "monster" a long time ago.
In general, the supervisor used 16 episodes to tell an unpleasant story that could be finished in 8 episodes that did not appeal to me.
Many people learn from Gary, this is an example of failure. With a failed product, a comparison with a good one can show how good a good one is.
[Example]
The feeling that the characters are not smart or personality in dialogue, pretending to be smart and personality. For example, the role of the deputy editor in the first episode seems to be a supervisor who said to a voice actor: You have to pronounce this line with the feeling of a smart person. So the seiyuu worked hard to lean towards that feeling. There is no feeling that smart people speak smart words spontaneously. It may be that the characterization itself is not successful, and the character's lines are not well designed. It's just an empty shell.
View more about Baccano! reviews
