Alina of Character Sketch and the Conception of the Social Model of Borrowing Questions

The character of Alina really has a classic meaning.

She does wear some of the characteristics of modern people, "hate, curse, and curse everything around", completely unable to understand God, belief, religion, sacred, ancient spirit, and even insult, abuse and beat them-Alina is in When he studied martial arts in the orphanage, he escaped from Romania and worked in Germany. However, she has not been influenced by any "Protestant sects" or "anti-defense fighters", nor has she adapted to modern life beyond the mountains. From the root point of view, the life value of modern people has never been connoted and nurtured in it. It just adapts to the modern lifestyle and even the way of thinking, but does not fully and fully accept the values ​​of modernity (there are many typical "sandwich people", especially the "intellectual brand diaosi" is the most typical) . Therefore, Alina's love for her childhood friend Vigkia, who is already a nun, is deep and paranoid to the original level, which makes her abandon modern life and return to living in the mountains full of orthodox restrictions. "Childish" hatred for "taking away the gods, priests, nuns and orthodox churches of dimension." There is a clue-like metaphor that runs through the beginning and is quite meaningful: two [medicine], namely medicine and faith, can not heal and save Alina’s hysteria and soul, because neither can make it [dream come true] or [Knowledge and action are the same]-She just can't restore the friendly relationship that belongs to only two people with Vigor Kia-Alina is a "modern person" in "prehistory", anti-modern, not retro Activists. But this characteristic of her is precisely the most typical [sickness] of modernity. People living in modern times are all [foreigners] or [infidels] inside and outside the mountains. And this is connected to a question that can trigger a more subtle image:

[Alina: "I tried but God just can't save me. If it is almighty, why can't it satisfy my desire?" "
Vigkia:" You are wrong. God satisfies our needs instead of what we want."
Alina: "But what I think is my need and I need you"]

The problem is that what Alina possesses is a kind of "degraded divine love", that is, it can be understood in this way. She actually resembles [copy] the image of the improper gods in ancient Greece, so as to Love is no less than love for God, but she is in love with a person. She angrily [like] maintaining the legitimacy and legitimacy of her love as orthodoxy excludes heresy, so that she rudely excludes religion and God itself. She was [punished] because of this. She was tied to a broken board like a cross and finally died of dehydration, but she did not represent the "Jesus" worth regretting, so when her body stayed in the hospital, although the doctor died Reasonably reprimanded the Orthodox, but only regarded her as an ordinary dead person. After [Murdering Religion], [Foreigners] did not enjoy the respect of [Modernity], but was completely [ignored]-"A boy killed his mother and posted a photo on the Internet" "(Modern) has cracked Up".

PS:

It turns out that this Mengji filmed . I only sigh that this is too much more powerful than the last one, but the "ferry" is weaker than the last one. Fortunately, it's not this or that. The ethical exploration attitude continues. The last question about the axiology of abortion (it would be easier to deal with only the form and decision-making) problem has always troubled me: How old is the baby in the mother's womb, starting from a [person]? From the perspective of pan-humanism, as long as there is, the child is an individual. This does not violate the ethics of Buddhism or Christianity. But the problem is that the mother, as a pregnant body, determines the father of her child. She is the one responsible and exercising [human rights]. The child did not come into the society at this time and did not have this [power] and [capacity] at all, and The key point is that it does not yet have [humanity]. Even the foundation of [sympathy] is based on the foundation and background of [everyone is human, with common feelings and understanding prerequisites]. As a result, pan-humanitarianism will automatically output the principles and conclusions that deny itself. On the contrary, the ethics of the period of Buddhism taught that [people] are nothing more than [karma and harmony], and parents have nothing to do with their children. Innate or God-given or natural restraint power-what should be responsible and entitled to become powerless and irresponsible, young children do not have [human rights] but have [karma], how can they be broken? In fact, all types of effective performance societies will not be too obsessed with the above issues, but if you imagine a society dominated by the above two ethics or cross-dominated, it will become excessively interesting<

View more about Beyond the Hills reviews