Ignored movie protagonist

Katelin 2022-09-19 23:33:30

Nanuk in the north was photographed between 1920 and 1921. It has been more than 90 years since we have been. And the value of this film has long been more than just the film itself. He is the first documentary film in the world, and Flahadi, who made the film, is also known as the father of documentary films. Of course, an important controversial topic that accompanies this film is the relationship between reality and posing. But today I don't want to discuss these, because the predecessors have already analyzed thoroughly enough, but I am still relatively junior. Today I just talk about my own feelings, just the film itself.

Reality is a force that can shock people. Whether it's posing or real. Hunting seals is real, and building igloos is also real. The so-called actors are also Eskimos who kill walruses and cover igloos outright. When I saw them rowing a small boat to look for the walrus, I seemed to see an army of thousands of horses.
The excellence of Nanuk in the north is unquestionable. The photographer went to such a harsh environment alone. His spirit is very precious. The life of the Eskimos shown in the film also deeply touched me. They are passionate. Kind and brave. Live the most primitive but purest life. Every day, the Nanuk family uses all their enthusiasm and strength to live, but what he pursues, or what he can pursue, is to find food and fill his stomach. To live is already their highest ideal. Thinking about the living conditions of modern people groaning without illness, in front of the tall Nanuk, I feel very ashamed.

But it is such a group of people who have nothing to do with the world, but they are willing to help Vlahadi unconditionally complete his movie. In fact, after the Eskimos did business with white people, they stopped hunting and killing walruses because they were too dangerous. Adult walruses weighed two tons. But in order to help Vlahadi, they are willing to take another risk. Because of insufficient lighting, the shooting in the igloo was actually done in half of the igloo, which means that the Hanuk’s family performed a life scene of undressing and sleeping for Vlahadi in the ice and snow of the Arctic. . What does it matter if such a sacrifice is true or not?

Two years after Vlahadi returned to the "civilized world", news came that Hanuk had passed away. Nanuk did not store enough food for the winter because he helped Vlahadi to shoot the movie. During the food expedition, Nanuk was starved to death.

There are countless professional and non-professional comments on this film. Mention the various values ​​of this film, various contributions to anthropology, sociology, and film art. But for Nanuk's death, everyone passed by, as if discussed. As the best hunter among the Eskimos, Nanuk starved to death for helping us so-called people from the civilized world. Yes, there are more people in this world who know Eskimos and love Eskimos, but will this change their lives? Will they no longer be cold? Will they no longer go hungry? Instead, it will perish due to our intervention.

If Vlahadi died because of the filming of this film, I think it was a dedication to art. He should do it. If he died for what he was after, it would be considered dead. Similarly, if I were a director, I wouldn't have any complaints. As a TV person, this is our responsibility. But Nanuk is not. He is an ordinary Eskimo. He should have exhausted all his enthusiasm for survival in the snow and ice, then quietly closed his eyes and died in the pure snow and holy life. It is not up to us to accelerate his death.

Is our world really civilized? We do everything we can to change the laws of nature. Is it really correct?

Originally, I wanted to write a serious article about my feelings, express my respect and love for Nanuk, and pay tribute to the originator of the great documentary. But as I wrote it, my thoughts drifted to this, and my roommate was calling and quarreling with my boyfriend, which made me very irritable. This is why I hate dorm life. When you want to calm down and think about some things, It has to be the same as a lottery.

Just write this

View more about Nanook of the North reviews

Extended Reading

Nanook of the North quotes

  • Title Card: The shrill piping of the wind, the rasp and hiss of driving snow, the mournful wolf howls of Nanook's master dog typify the melancholy spirit of the North.

  • Robert Flaherty, Director: At last, in 1920, I thought I had shot enough scenes to make the film, and prepared to go home. Poor old Nanook hung around my cabin, talking over films we still could make if I would only stay on for another year. He never understood why I should have gone to all the fuss and bother of making the "big aggie" of him. Less than two years later I received word that Nanook had ventured into the interior hoping for deer and had starved to death. But our "big aggie" become "Nanook of the North" has gone into most of the odd corners of the world, and more men than there are stones around the shore of Nanook's home have looked upon Nanook, the kindly, brave, simple Eskimo.