I remember that Teacher Wang said a very pleasing sentence to the effect that "most writers are simplifying their lives". The so-called "art comes from life above life", can I understand that this is a kind of obscenity of the working people about the reality that cannot be changed? !
So when I watched this film, my heart was guilty:
it is very real, and it is not a humorous comedy at all. If you watch it as an absurd film, it means that you are already close to collapse normally. If you watch it as a documentary, it means you have collapsed close to normal.
It is not recommended for married women to look at it, as you will know the true face of a man by looking at it. It is not good for your marriage, and it is easy to subvert your fragile worldview.
It is not recommended for married men to watch, for fear of embarrassment. The dirty water in the man's stomach is like the underwear hanging on the streets of Shanghai, naked and displayed for admiration.
It is recommended that those who are not married look at it. After reading it, it may be able to contribute to the country's population reduction.
This film also has a lot of social significance, so I will skip it.
The lines in the film are very good, the words are very incisive (check the dictionary), it is recommended to look at the English subtitles.
The advantage of the old film is that the technique is not used excessively. Many so-called art films now use the same structure and technique as they did decades ago, but the lens is more refined, with a pile of Hisaishi Jean + Hollywood Orchestra, there is no substantial innovation.
I like the way the protagonist advances his wife-killing plan step by step in the lawyer's loud defense recitation. It may not be new, but it is very dramatic. It's been a long time.
The lighting is very strange, and I can't figure out that the technology of that era was so bad that characters walking in a hell-like room deliberately created this kind of light source effect. Let's just think that the technical means of the year were limited.
The only regret is the ending. At least three paragraphs gave me hints (requirements) for the ending. As a result, I continued to tell the story. At the end, the new wife and the seaman had an affair. In order to prevent the audience from misunderstanding that this film is fighting for freedom for love, it also allows the audience to understand that betrayal is the characteristic of our coexistence.
However, the audience who has experienced the wonderful morality of skinning for 1 hour and 30 minutes, even without this snake foot, will they really firmly believe that we are all pure people? . . .
View more about Divorce Italian Style reviews
