However, the relationship between the master and servant in the film is indeed relatively GAY. The servant is 1 and the master is 0. This is very obvious. Although it is not stated clearly, there are many There are hints everywhere. A
lot of small details, if you take a closer look, it is very interesting. It
just happens that I am more free, to list
1. The appearance of both of them is relatively young and beautiful, especially the owner, with blond hair, relatively female Make it a little bit. The servant is relatively mature, deep-haired, but also very beautiful. Doesn't this fit the GAY aesthetic?
2. The personality of the two people, the master is very dependent, the habit of the son-in-law, often loses his temper. It's very similar to women. The servant is scheming and takes care of the master in life.
3. There are countless details in the plot. It is more obvious that the servant automatically offers his girlfriend, if it is not GAY, is it so generous ?
4. later, after leaving the servant came back, their relationship has undergone a qualitative change, I think he was GAY after both came back up from dialogue, all aspects of the move has hinted that more obvious scene, they In hide-and-seek, the servant said, "I got your little secrect, puss puss pussy..." This is the most obvious. Both little secrect and pussy allude to "little secret" and the servant treats the master as a female. And the conversation between the two later. This will not list them one by one.
Although from the beginning to the end, there was no physical contact between the two of the two in the film, nor did it clearly indicate that this is a GAY film. I think due to the social acceptance at the time, the director has tried his best to imply that this is a completely GAY film.
The film is a reflection of the era and its style is also very good. The two actors are also very good, the servant is the famous Dirk Bogarde.
View more about The Servant reviews
