I can’t say that this movie is bad, but it’s pretty self-abusing to watch this movie.
The black and white images and the content reflected in the film have a lingering dark, gloomy, and heavy tone, and the director’s intentional shooting methods are always adding to the audience.
For example, you can tell it is fake rain at a glance, because you have never seen such fake rain, so you can tell at a glance
Can't it be made more realistic?
You still can't say that he is just fooling around. What if people are using artistic expressions that you don't understand? What if people just want it to look fake on purpose to achieve something you don't understand?
I can only say that the long shots that seem to be obviously sprinklers or large water pipes or other methods of artificial rainfall give people a very bad look and feel, and the noise from the unpleasant piano is really torturing.
Then the whole film excludes the essential core, just because of the way of shooting, there are too many uncomfortable places, and it is always challenging the limits of the audience’s tolerance.
The scene of abusing cats is extremely uncomfortable. The cat is fatter and cute. The line of the film is that people say to the cat, "I am stronger than you, you must do what I tell you to do", and then abuse the cat. This video The abuse in the video lasted for more than ten minutes, and the length of the image should be several hours or half a day or more than half a day. Finally, the cat was poisoned to death. I dug a hole and wanted to bury the cat, but did not bury the cat everywhere. Running, raining, walking until dark, watching people dancing, and walking until dawn, endless long shots, holding the cat’s body and walking, and finally holding the cat’s body and taking poison to commit suicide. The narrator said, "Angels will understand." (The cat’s corpse is stiff, I don’t know if it’s a prop, but it looks too realistic, and the rain is so fake, I have to make people suspect that the cat may be really dead. Is the rain fake just to contrast the cat? The truth of the corpse?) I understand the core of the film, but I really don’t understand it when you shoot it like this. This is simply abusive to the audience, because people are oppressed by the power. You have to do what the power asks you to do, so you can only go. Bullying weaker animals? This is to express a complaint? This is art? Art is killing cats? Does the cat understand your art? Is the cat willing to dedicate himself to your art? What's the difference between you doing cats like this and power doing you? Besides, in my opinion, the things that people in Eastern Europe have experienced in those years are nothing compared to the things that people in the Eastern Continent have experienced and are experiencing. How miserable? At least hundreds of millions of people were killed by the hammer and sickle, and tens of millions of people were hungry during the period of human misfortune. Mao is the No. 1 Demon King in history, Сталин, Hitler, and others. It has to be ranked behind it. You people in Eastern Europe have a very happy life. That's why the director is in the mood to sing and dance. When you are full, you can sing and dance. It’s clear to see that the moon is clear when the cloud is open, isn’t it? And now you feel that you have suffered some harm and want to express it, then can't you just express the complaint in a realistic manner? Why is it so dazzling and so mysterious?
Ending the whole movie with endless darkness is also very gloomy. After watching the movie hard, people do not breathe a sigh of relief, and continue to fall into a gloomy state for a long time, and the mood is very unbeautiful.
Is the director expressing emotion in this film? Are you engaged in artistic creation? I don’t understand. I just think that the director is on the opposite side of the audience. He wants to make the audience feel uncomfortable, and only makes the audience purely uncomfortable. Some pain can be touching, but the director gives only pain, no moving, no tears, only coldness. , There is only pain, only torture
The duration of this film can obviously be shortened a lot, and the shooting method is also negotiable. In other words, the torture of the film to the audience can be shortened without affecting its essential core.
The core of this kind of movie is real pain. Why bother to use such torturous shooting techniques to add pain to the pain? Why can't the expression technique be softer, so that the viewing process will not be so painful for all kinds of people? In fact, it can be more friendly to the general audience, isn’t it?
I firmly believe that great movies can withstand the test of time. After tens of hundreds of years, many people will still watch many people like them, such as " Modern Times ", " Metropolis ", " City lights ", "Road Angels"... . etc
I can’t say that this film is bad, but there’s no way to like it. I don’t know if it can withstand decades and hundreds of years.
So-and-so cooking is always infinitely obstructing people, and you have to make a movie that reflects so-and-so’s cooking.
Your collective farm has died out. Our collective farm is still operating as usual. Can't you treat the people who are still alive in your movie with gentleness?
So-and-so treats people just like people treat livestock such as pigs, cows, sheep, chickens, ducks, etc.
Living in such an environment, capable people want to escape, but people who do not have the ability to escape or who cannot escape for various reasons have no choice but to endure.
Everyone is a hard-working person, so why hurt each other so much, watching a movie even have to torture so much?
I really can’t understand that short reviews like "I hope I will read them again every year during my lifetime" and such short reviews have super popularity. This sentence itself is pretending to be compelling, and it is pretending that the form is greater than the content.
For me, this is a movie that I never want to watch a second time in my lifetime after watching it again.
Watching "Alive" I feel uncomfortable, painful, crying, and tears are like unscrewed faucets, rushing, but I am grateful to the director. The director’s performance is gentle, and the cause of the pain is the subject matter itself, and In my lifetime, I have watched "Alive" more than ten times, and I will watch it again. I can’t say every year. Maybe I’ll watch it a few times a year, maybe only a few years, but in my lifetime, I’m sure I will always rewatch it. "Alive"
And I can’t say that this film is bad, but I feel a bit resentful when the director shoots this way. If such a film is sincere, seeks truth from facts, and is simpler, I don’t think it will be bad.
In fact, it’s just as it is now, and it has nothing to do with the difference, but the audience is too small
The meaning of this film shouldn’t be so dazzling, artistic, and niche
I firmly believe that films with such themes should have special meaning and missions, such as " Schindler's List ", " La vita è bella ", " Gone with the wind ", "Farewell My Concubine"... etc.
Such a film should be a world-class image. It should be liked by millions of people on a certain station in the Eastern Continent. It should be seen by as many people as possible, rather than curled up in a very professional. Very artistic, dusty in the small circle, accept worship
To put it mildly, this movie shouldn't be poetry
To put it bluntly, this movie should not be used to pretend
It took me a week to download this video, not to mention the difficulty of finding it. I am a viewer who is not very good at finding resources.
File 16.1G, duration 439 minutes and 8 seconds, the file is too big, the configuration of my computer is too low and too aging
I used an old notebook I bought in 2010. It is very competitive. It has never been broken and has not been repaired. But after all, it will not be so neat when it is old. It has feelings for a long time. It is not bad. If it works, I can’t bear to change
When I watch movies over 3G, there will be stuttering, unsynchronized sound and picture, delays, etc., so generally I choose to download resources below 3G, and resources below 3G. When I play it, it will be smooth
Watching this movie I need to quit from time to time, and then turn on the player again, which can alleviate the lag situation a bit
Because of the computer problem, the process of watching this video itself is also very difficult
Before watching the movie, I read a lot of short and long reviews. I am not afraid of spoilers when I watch the movie, I am afraid I can’t understand it. I can’t understand it after watching "Let the Bullets Fly".
I have watched "Don't Stop the Camera" give up many times, and there is really no way to survive for half an hour. I always wonder about the number of commenters and scores.
Finally once, I insisted on it for half an hour before tasting its beauty
Therefore, people are very self-knowledge, I am really not a qualified audience, I am just a very ordinary audience with mediocre qualifications.
Preview before watching, arrange the time, correct the attitude, do a good job of mental construction, and have a meal. With sufficient preparation, I watched this film in one day, and the process of watching the film is really out of talk. Pleasant, I want to give up many times in the middle of the way, I totally relied on obsession to finish it
I didn’t shed tears when I watched a movie with this theme. It was my own failure or the success of the movie.
After watching this movie, I just deleted it. I will never watch this movie again in my lifetime.
Although my computer is very old and only has a 300G hard drive, I have a 2T mobile hard drive. I always save the movies I like when I encounter them. I have all these movies like "Alive", "Let the Bullets Fly", and "Don't Stop the Camera". It’s stored in the mobile hard drive, and I deleted this movie after watching it. I won’t save it. It’s not because its 16G is too big. I will definitely collect it), it’s not that it’s bad
I can’t and won’t say it’s bad, but it’s not very kind to the general audience
A movie released in 1994. As an ordinary person, an ordinary audience, I will only know about it in 2021.
And I actually probably won’t know it for the rest of my life
So because of a very accidental factor, I knew about it, and I said if it’s not good, it’s lucky.
This is the biggest problem with this movie
This movie and the core of the movie shouldn’t be such a niche existence
The subject matter of this movie has an audience of at least 2 billion people. It should be simple and easy to understand, well-known, and empathize with people. It should be soft and watery in people’s hearts, making people burst into tears without knowing it. ...
From 1994 to 2021, in 27 years, it has only more than 6,000 commenters on a certain station in the Eastern Continent, and only 10,000 and a few hundred commenters on IMDB.
Is this the original intention of the director? The film was made to make it enshrined in the hall of art, so that only a handful of people would worship it, and the vast majority of people would not even need to see it?
Is this a kind of sadness of the movie?
View more about Satantango reviews
