I am a little puzzled after watching, is this a science fiction movie like the horror cruise ship? If he is dead, and his obsession makes him desire to change everything and enter the cycle, how did he enter the first cycle, and how could he have the idea of changing all of this? After all, he didn't know the truth, and he also deliberately murdered his brother, and later it was because of the nurse's extortion that he wanted to change everything.
And is the process the same every time his cycle? According to the plot logic, he killed the man with a heart attack because he was fighting with the "doctor". This shows that in each cycle, there must be one thing that makes him discover that the things in 2002 can be changed by the choices he made in 2000. changes happened. Before the heart disease patient died, he joked that the male protagonist was the god of death. Generally speaking, this is metaphorical, but from the blackmailing of nurses, this kind of change will only happen in the body, not in the memory. What's the meaning of words?
In this movie, the male protagonist, brother, and sister-in-law are all dead. This is an unchangeable ending, which means that every time the male protagonist wakes up, he will be confused because of the crossing, and then explore the memory, and then find his Behavior can change the reality in 2002, then go back to the past to take measures, and finally reach the end. It seems that the plot can only proceed according to this logic, which seems to be an answer to the previous question. .
After thinking about it, this movie is still missing something. For example, the taxi driver on the horror cruise ship symbolizes the identity of a god of death. But in this movie, there are still many details that are not clear, such as why two years later, why his father became a pediatrician and also responsible for all the patients involved in the movie (whether pediatrics and lollipops can It is explained that the male protagonist who has lost his memory is eager for his father's help like a child? But if the pediatrician exists as a father, he does not have any symbolic words about his brother's affairs)? What is the trigger point of the crossing, the doctor who went to the morgue just to avoid embarrassment and talk?
I really can’t think about the details. I once again think of a point I’ve seen before. Suspense films don’t need to talk about great truths. Being compact and logically self-consistent is the greatest success.
View more about The I Inside reviews
